Paul Eggert wrote:
Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
Me too.
How about this proposal?
* Change the progname module to use the BSD
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:07:20PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
char *
get_prog_name(void)
{
char * name;
if (prog_name)
name = prog_name;
else
{
#if defined(HAVE_GETPROGNAME)
#include stdlib.h
name = getprogname();
#elif
[ This is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/5080
Please remove bug-gnulib from followups. Thank you. ]
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:06:59AM CET:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
Is it a problem in practice, ie, what are these non-Unix linkers?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| [ This is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/5080
| Please remove bug-gnulib from followups. Thank you. ]
|
| * Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:06:59AM CET:
|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry)
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
How about this proposal?
* Change the progname module to use the
