Thanks for the review. I confirmed your changes, and I found no problem.
> CC'ing this to grep-devel since that's where the hardy band of dfa
> consumers hang out.
I will also do it in next post for dfa.
Jim Meyering wrote:
I see one typo in your 2nd change's log: s/cdalls/calls/
Omit unnecessary cdalls to zeroset.
Thanks, I fixed that.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone review this change?
>
>
> Thanks for doing all that, and sorry about the late review. I reviewed it,
> tweaked its commit message and propagated that into ChangeLog (the gnulib
> practice), and installed
Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
Can anyone review this change?
Thanks for doing all that, and sorry about the late review. I reviewed it,
tweaked its commit message and propagated that into ChangeLog (the gnulib
practice), and installed the result into gnulib, with two followup patches that
I hope ar
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 22:00:33 +0900
Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:45:43 +0900
> Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
>
> > When dfa builds a state, generates all next states. However, I believe
> > most of them are not used.
> >
> > This patch changes as that when dfa builds a state, g
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:45:43 +0900
Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
> When dfa builds a state, generates all next states. However, I believe
> most of them are not used.
>
> This patch changes as that when dfa builds a state, generates a next
> state including next input character only.
>
> The followi
