On 03/07/2018 03:58 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> doc/maintain.texi.
>
> bug-standa...@gnu.org
Whaddya know, it turns out that I have the bits to do bug-standards
after all; I'd forgotten about that. I installed a patch and propagated
it into Gnulib.
build-aux/texinfo.tex
build-aux/texinfo.tex
bug-texi...@gnu.org
and doc/maintain.texi.
bug-standa...@gnu.org
I think Karl Berry can do those so I'll CC: him.
Technically I can still commit to the repos, but I think it would be
better if I didn't step in.
(I can't help but remark that backward
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 11:46:56AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> These are all upstream from Gnulib. For the first two, I'm attaching
> a proposed patch and CC'ing this to config-patches. For the last
> one, I fixed the upstream and propagated it to Gnulib.
Applied.
Ben
signature.asc
On 03/07/2018 09:32 AM, Glenn Morris wrote:
Thanks for replacing the obsolete forms.
A few files were already using write-file-functions; I don't know if
you want to change those to before-save-hook, for consistency.
From today's gnulib:
build-aux/config.sub
build-aux/config.guess
Thanks for replacing the obsolete forms.
A few files were already using write-file-functions; I don't know if
you want to change those to before-save-hook, for consistency.
>From today's gnulib:
build-aux/config.sub
build-aux/config.guess
doc/standards.texi
Glenn Morris wrote:
Please replace "write-file-hooks" with "before-save-hook".
I did that in all files maintained in Gnulib, along with files we're copying
from Automake (I updated Automake), by installing the attached. Two files remain
that I don't believe I have commit privileges on
Glenn Morris wrote:
I assumed any utility to keeping the time stamps
update was solely for edits in gnulib itself.
I assumed otherwise, in that if a change was made downstream by hand they'd want
the timestamps to be updated.
By the way, I would rather remove these timestamps as they are
Paul Eggert wrote (on Tue, 6 Mar 2018 at 19:43 -0800):
> That would make sense if we assume that Gnulib source files live in a
> directory
> controlled by the .dir-locals.el file. However, Gnulib is designed to copy
> source files hither and yon, and it'd be a pain to arrange to update the
>
Glenn Morris wrote:
PS If you drop Emacs < 23.1 (released July 2009), you can switch to a
single .dir-locals.el file (rather than having the same stanza in
multiple source files)
That would make sense if we assume that Gnulib source files live in a directory
controlled by the .dir-locals.el
PS If you drop Emacs < 23.1 (released July 2009), you can switch to a
single .dir-locals.el file (rather than having the same stanza in
multiple source files), as someone pointed out in
http://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2011-02/msg00282.html
10 matches
Mail list logo
