Paul Eggert wrote:
> > - Should glibc define SA_RESETHAND as ((int)0x8000) ?
> >Then SA_RESETHAND could not be used in preprocessor directives any more.
>
> POSIX would allow that, as it doesn't require SA_RESETHAND to be usable
> in preprocessor directives. However, too much software use
On 5/21/20 8:15 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
- Should glibc define SA_RESETHAND as ((int)0x8000) ?
Then SA_RESETHAND could not be used in preprocessor directives any more.
POSIX would allow that, as it doesn't require SA_RESETHAND to be usable
in preprocessor directives. However, too much s
