Paul Eggert wrote:
getopt-posix: No longer guarantee that option processing is resettable.
That looks good to me, and thanks.
Thanks for the review. Eric was silent. So I'm applying this change, together
with a note in the NEWS file.
Bruno
DateModules Changes
Hi Paul, Eric,
I wrote:
It seems to me that
- musl's getopt is POSIX compliant (at least it passes the 3 parts of
the test when run individually).
- The getopt.m4 test fails only because musl does not support one of
the 3 known ways to reset option processing. Does it support
On 06/23/2012 09:22 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
getopt-posix: No longer guarantee that option processing is resettable.
That looks good to me, and thanks.
Rich Felker wrote:
3. The test for POSIX compatible getopt does not actually test for
POSIX compatibility, but for GNU semantics which are contrary to
POSIX. This is purely an issue of a misnamed test; if gnulib wants to
provide a replacement getopt with GNU semantics, that's okay, but
