On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 2:08 PM Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> > > I guess the fix should be to detect the glibc bug in m4/regex.m4 ?
> >
> > Exactly. That's what I'm doing now.
> > I'm expecting to insert something like this, probably reusing the
> > result value of "64":
> >
> > /*
Hi Jim,
> > I guess the fix should be to detect the glibc bug in m4/regex.m4 ?
>
> Exactly. That's what I'm doing now.
> I'm expecting to insert something like this, probably reusing the
> result value of "64":
>
> /* Matching with the compiled form of this regexp would
> provoke
>
