Thank you for this patch! I already applied it.
The only way I can explain the current code here is that I tried my best
to work around all the compiler warnings about mismatched types and that
somehow left the extra & operator.
Fred
Am 13.03.2010 00:52, schrieb Anibal Rindisbacher:
> Hi everyone
Am 13.03.2010 01:25, schrieb Anibal Rindisbacher:
> Hi, me again. I try to understand the code in back/Source/art/blit.m, I
> focus in warnings now, the line in MPRE(run_opaque) of that file:
>
> unsigned int v;
> unsigned short *dst = (unsigned short *)ri->dst;
>
> COPY_ASSEMBLE_PIXEL(v, ri->r,
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #29203 (project gnustep):
> Are there any plans to add sync support to gcc's libobjc any
> time soon? If not, I'd be in favor of removing sync support from
> GNUstep's libobjc and not getting into the troubles of adding an
> autoconf test.
GCC is currently frozen (o
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #29208 (project gnustep):
Thanks. Here is my attemt; I'd appreciate a thorough review. The leading
space is important for sorting/alignment -- I see that %e omits it (contrary
to what the documentation says); probably to match Cocoa behavior?
Tested with the attached
