[bug #42698] Recommended future steps for gnustep-dl2 debian package maintenance

2014-07-08 Thread matt rice
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #42698 (project gnustep): I recall that being more about limiting the number of debian packages, and trying to find a good split of gui/non-gui, I even made the case that libEOModeler could be shipped with DBModeler here

[bug #42698] Recommended future steps for gnustep-dl2 debian package maintenance

2014-07-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #42698 (project gnustep): I am not sure it was in the same discussion. Anyway. The dependency on Renaissance is not a problem at all. I even made the case that libEOModeler could be shipped with DBModeler here It is exactly what we are doing. Perhaps we should

[bug #42698] Recommended future steps for gnustep-dl2 debian package maintenance

2014-07-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #42698 (project gnustep): We can try to ship both apps with a bit of effort. EOModeler is distributed as a private library in Debian, because David Ayers once told us it was going to undergo major changes. Is the current split what he meant back then? What are the

[bug #42698] Recommended future steps for gnustep-dl2 debian package maintenance

2014-07-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #42698 (project gnustep): (MySQL+Postgres in one package) Of course I meant SQLite, not MySQL. ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42698 ___