Re: Full unicode support for back-xlib(4) (was Re: Full unicodesupport for back-xlib (2))

2003-07-23 Thread Adam Fedor
I applied this patch. Thanks! Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: Though it may sound strange to you, I couldn't make an integrated patch via 'cvs diff -R -Nu'; the CVS ignored the option -N or --new-file. Am I wrong? Anyway, I made an all-in-one patch through the classical 'diff -Naru back

Full unicode support for back-xlib(4) (was Re: Full unicode supportfor back-xlib (2))

2003-07-22 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
Adam Fedor wrote: Fred Kiefer wrote: Hi Kazu, we now have reached a disagreement and need some more views on the remaining problems. Perhaps Nicola, Adam, Wim or Alex could join in and state their views on the use font sets. I am away for a few days anyway. Is this just about strtok or

Re: Full unicode support for back-xlib (2)

2003-07-20 Thread Adam Fedor
Fred Kiefer wrote: Hi Kazu, we now have reached a disagreement and need some more views on the remaining problems. Perhaps Nicola, Adam, Wim or Alex could join in and state their views on the use font sets. I am away for a few days anyway. Is this just about strtok or something else? It

Re: Full unicode support for back-xlib (2)

2003-07-19 Thread Fred Kiefer
Hi Kazu, we now have reached a disagreement and need some more views on the remaining problems. Perhaps Nicola, Adam, Wim or Alex could join in and state their views on the use font sets. I am away for a few days anyway. Cheers Fred Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: Fred Kiefer wrote: snip It is even

Re: Full unicode support for back-xlib (2)

2003-07-18 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
Fred Kiefer wrote: Fred Kiefer wrote: snip - As XGFontSetEnumerator is currently not implemented I would remove all reverences to it. (Reading references for reverences,) At first, I declared XGFontSetEnumerator without implementation, and then I got an exception telling me that

Full unicode support for back-xlib (3)

2003-07-18 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
Hi, Sorry for frequent revision, but the fuctinality still remains the same. By introducing the new user default value GSXEnableFontSet, all the patches relevant to the configuration at compilation time have gone. To enable the functionality, do $ defaults write NSGlobalDomain

Re: Full unicode support for back-xlib (2)

2003-07-17 Thread Fred Kiefer
for the use of the XFT fonts. Cheers Fred Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: Based on Fred Kiefer's suggestion, I rewrote the patches I previously sent to bug-gnustep with the email 'Full unicode support for back-xlib'. A few bug fixes have also been done. While the functionality the new patches offer remains

Re: Full unicode support for back-xlib

2003-07-16 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
Fred Kiefer wrote: Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: Fred Kiefer wrote: As you by now will have noticed, the xlib backend comes along with its own XFT font class and I think that the font set support should be packaged up in a similar way. That is, a separate class in its own file that gets

Re: Full unicode support for back-xlib

2003-07-15 Thread Fred Kiefer
Hi Kazu, this is a nice patch you came up with. This should fill the gap between people only able to use basic X fonts and the ones with a XFT implementation (which also offers UTF8 support). As far as I know font sets are not restricted to XFree86 so this may be of help for more people out

Full unicode support for back-xlib

2003-07-10 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
Hi, all. Attached are the patches to make the xlib backend fully supports unicode. Accordingly, if the patches are applied, the backend should handle all characters represented with NSGlyph. If the X Window System in use is already set up properly for your language environment (i.e., locale,