Re: New 'back' backend

2002-04-06 Thread Fred Kiefer
Hi Nicola, for your fix in the bundle make file you added a comment that we should explain, why we have to link against all libraries on Windows while we don't need this on any other system. The reason is simple, we don't need this on Windows either. What we need there is that we define a

Re: New 'back' backend

2002-04-05 Thread Pete French
that occurred to me too ... and well it is certainly caused by the fact that gnustep-make has been modified to link bundles against all libraries So does that mean that it staticly links bundles against available libraries rather than using the shared libraries on startup ? I am somewhat

Re: New 'back' backend

2002-04-05 Thread Nicola Pero
that occurred to me too ... and well it is certainly caused by the fact that gnustep-make has been modified to link bundles against all libraries So does that mean that it staticly links bundles against available libraries rather than using the shared libraries on startup ? I am somewhat

Re: New 'back' backend

2002-04-05 Thread Pete French
Ahh, I get it... was this change made to support Windows by any chance ? One of the big problems with Bundles on the old OpenSTep forNT was that you culdnt call anything from the main application that you needed to link against - it all had to be linked into the bundle separately. This might be

Re: New 'back' backend

2002-04-04 Thread Nicola Pero
having done that I now get a coredump. that occurred to me too ... and well it is certainly caused by the fact that gnustep-make has been modified to link bundles against all libraries ... that change is delicate and probably needs to be fixed somewhat ... problem is understanding all the bits