On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> I heard that compiling Firefox is a lot more complicated than the standard
> ./configure, make, make install, ldconfig (or the use of cmake). Is that
> true?
>
A little bit but most of the hard work has been done for us. I set up a
I agree. It may seem to be silly, but Google does no evil, and Mozilla cares
about our right to privacy.
--
-Dan Q
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:39:11 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Icecat looks included non-free code. Please, remove the file
>
>
Icecat looks included non-free code. Please, remove the file
./dom/system/gonk/tests/marionette/ril_jshint/jshint.js
Bad license:
> * JSHint, by JSHint Community.
> *
> * This file (and this file only) is licensed under the same slightly >
modified
> * MIT license that JSLint is. It stops
On Mar 5, 2017, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> Please reconsider your discontinuation of Windows and Mac versions, as libre
> browsing is most needed in DRM-based OSes, not Linux :(
The source is still available for compilation on any platform.
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
pretty *easy
El 06/03/17 a les 10:23, Narcis Garcia ha escrit:
> Libre browsing is needed in any environment; one main difference (about
> results) is that in DRM-based OSes is really difficult to reach freedom
> in this, and in libre OSes is pretty if you use IceCat.
>
>
> El 06/03/17 a les
Libre browsing is needed in any environment; one main difference (about
results) is that in DRM-based OSes is really difficult to reach freedom
in this, and in libre OSes is pretty if you use IceCat.
El 06/03/17 a les 00:11, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
> Please reconsider your discontinuation