How I handle it: Accept cookies, accept third-party cookies, clear cookies when
you close the browser.
--
-Dan Q
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:22:46 +0200, David Hedlund wrote:
> >Cookie Monster (CM) rejects 3rd-party cookies by default so you have
> to whitelist a lot of
> David, have you tried "Cookie Monster", or any other similar add-on?
This is my conclusion regarding cookie add-ons that I evaluated in
https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:IceCat_extensions_(proposed)
* I use Self-destructing cookies as recommended in the link mentioned
Please do not take this as anything but constructive criticism. I fully
understand how limited the
resources are, and I firmly believe that even in the present state icecat &
most of the bundled
features are incredibly useful and effective. I am merely trying to point out
some directions for
uBlock Origin a bit of a learning curve for Adblock Plus users but I do agree
we should switch.
But, more importantly, get out an updated, secure IceCat release before making
feature enhancements.
--
-Dan Q
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:48:36 +0700, Sedov Andrey wrote:
>
"something that nobody uses"
-> Your statistics source?
Mozilla removal of "cookies askings" is inspired on legal obligation for
websites about asking every visitor.
Mozilla shifts its responsibility to websites, and allows websites to
fulfill their way in a more or less suitable interaction with
"Daniel Quintiliani" writes:
> Why is everyone so opposed to an addon for something that nobody uses?
> I can't imagine anyone clicking 20 dialog boxes per each loaded banner
> ad. So opposed to using an addon that they are unwilling to update
> serious security problems in
Why is everyone so opposed to an addon for something that nobody uses? I can't
imagine anyone clicking 20 dialog boxes per each loaded banner ad. So opposed
to using an addon that they are unwilling to update serious security problems
in software?
All I know is that all of this politics is
David Hedlund wrote:
> Consider to keep the code for cookies "ask me every time" from Firefox 43
> for IceCat 45.
Concur. This is a must-have feature, and one that should not have been
removed in the first place. If that functionality is kept in IceCat 45,
then there would certainly be more
+1
El 23/09/16 a les 03:12, David Hedlund ha escrit:
> From https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1118394
>
> hi, the ask anytime option for cookies was removed in firefox 44, which
> was supposed to happen for a long time (bug 606655).
>
> i would recommend the following setup instead: