Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat future development

Vote for ng0's proposal on https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49604 -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Cookie prompt

Option 1 segmented to http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49607 On 2016-11-15 01:26, Mart Rootamm wrote: The cookie prompt vote is now here: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49603 -M. 2016-11-14 21:20 GMT+02:00 Mart Rootamm >:

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] concerning voting & further directions

Concur on most points. I support informed consensus, insofar as it would succeed in restoring some previously built-in privacy features. Simple voting as it's happening here and at Savannah, is not necessarily democracy, because without any proper discussion, it's often uninformed, and becomes

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Tor code base

I don't know about the Windows and macOS ports but the Linux version of Icecat could be derived from the Trisquel abrowser source if they are kind enough to allow and encourage us to do so. My comments here should in no way be considered a judgement of either of these ambitious and much needed

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Tor code base

Voting against: #2 and No, that is — per arguments by Gary Driggs. Additional voting is here: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49604 The Tor Browser is its own thing, and its code base seems to have diverged, though most of it is based on upstream Firefox ESR. If IceCat were based on Tor

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Cookie prompt

The cookie prompt vote is now here: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49603 -M. 2016-11-14 21:20 GMT+02:00 Mart Rootamm : > Vote #1 — integrate old cookie prompt into the next ESR, and then develop > it further. This will bring more users to IceCat. > > An add-on is

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Tor code base

I see this project having more in common with the Trisquel browser project than TOR browser. I haven't seen anyone list the pros or cons so I'll have to vote against if it's just arbitrary. -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Spyblock

"Daniel Quintiliani" writes: > On Spyblock, should we: > > 1. Keep Spyblock > 2. Replace with uBlock Origin > 3. Remove Spyblock > > I vote #2 I vote #2 -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Tor code base

"Daniel Quintiliani" writes: > Should we use the Tor code as a basis for Icecat? > > 1. Yes > 2. No > > I vote #1 Assuming that you mean torbrowser code, where most of it is being upstreamed anyway, I vote #1 -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

[Bug-gnuzilla] VOTING HAS MOVED TO SAVANNAH

David Hedlund suggested we vote using Savannah's bug tracking system. The three votes are in the Bugs section: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php -- -Dan Q -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

[Bug-gnuzilla] concerning voting & further directions

This is just brain-storming, meant for comment only. I am not convinced voting over a bunch of small initiatives would be very effective, at any rate, I will abstain for now. I think before voting we need to have a consensus on the general direction as we are moving forward, which is not

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Cookie prompt

Vote #1 — integrate old cookie prompt into the next ESR, and then develop it further. This will bring more users to IceCat. An add-on is not a good idea, because people not familiar with it would have to find it. The built-in cookie prompt would continue the tradition started by Mozilla

[Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Spyblock

On Spyblock, should we: 1. Keep Spyblock 2. Replace with uBlock Origin 3. Remove Spyblock I vote #2 -- -Dan Q -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

[Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Tor code base

Should we use the Tor code as a basis for Icecat? 1. Yes 2. No I vote #1 -- -Dan Q -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

[Bug-gnuzilla] [VOTE] Cookie prompt

Vote: We should: 1. Wait until we can integrate the old cookie prompt into the new ESR code before a release 2. Allow this feature to be removed and recommend a free addon I vote #2 -- -Dan Q -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

[Bug-gnuzilla] Can we handle this stuff with a vote?

Hi, Icecat has been unsafe and insecure for months because people have been arguing over trivial things and the developers are waiting for our opinions but refusing to act. I say we handle this with a mailing list vote. I don't know all the arguments, but for the first week, every issue would