[Bug-gnuzilla] Approved WebExtensions

2017-09-02 Thread David Hedlund
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/disconnect/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/google-search-link-fix/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/privacy-badger17/

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] WebExtension add-ons

2017-09-02 Thread David Hedlund
Approved WebExtensions for IceCat: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:IceCat_WebExtensions_(proposed)#Approved This link will be permanent. -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock Origins 1.14.0 incompatible with IceCat 52.1.0

2017-09-02 Thread Mart Rootamm
David, why is Waterfox not fully free? -M. 2017-09-03 5:11 GMT+03:00, David Hedlund : > > > On 2017-09-03 04:05, Mart Rootamm wrote: >> Hi, Felix >> I think your input would be welcome, though I'm not an integral part >> of the GNU community, so I can't speak for GNU people.

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock Origins 1.14.0 incompatible with IceCat 52.1.0

2017-09-02 Thread David Hedlund
On 2017-09-03 04:05, Mart Rootamm wrote: Hi, Felix I think your input would be welcome, though I'm not an integral part of the GNU community, so I can't speak for GNU people. The Waterfox project is planning to open its own extensions store that supports XUL. I wonder, if it would instead be

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock Origins 1.14.0 incompatible with IceCat 52.1.0

2017-09-02 Thread David Hedlund
On 2017-09-03 04:05, Mart Rootamm wrote: Hi, Felix I think your input would be welcome, though I'm not an integral part of the GNU community, so I can't speak for GNU people. The Waterfox project is planning to open its own extensions store that supports XUL. I wonder, if it would instead be

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock Origins 1.14.0 incompatible with IceCat 52.1.0

2017-09-02 Thread Daniel Quintiliani
Pale Moon will also keep XUL support ongoing, that has been my main browser for a long time. -- -Dan Q On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 16:36:04 +0300, Mart Rootamm wrote: > There is great consternation amonst users and some developers about > the deprecation of XUL in Firefox and

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock Origins 1.14.0 incompatible with IceCat 52.1.0

2017-09-02 Thread David Hedlund
On 2017-09-02 15:36, Mart Rootamm wrote: There is great consternation amonst users and some developers about the deprecation of XUL in Firefox and some derivatives, because many useful extensions would be made incompatible. It would therefore be great, if GNU hosted (or at least linked to) both

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock Origins 1.14.0 incompatible with IceCat 52.1.0

2017-09-02 Thread Mart Rootamm
There is great consternation amonst users and some developers about the deprecation of XUL in Firefox and some derivatives, because many useful extensions would be made incompatible. It would therefore be great, if GNU hosted (or at least linked to) both the XUL-compatible extensions, and those

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock Origins 1.14.0 incompatible with IceCat 52.1.0

2017-09-02 Thread mdn
Le 02/09/2017 06:51, David Hedlund a écrit : > This was quickly solved after I discussed with the author. I updated > https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/UBlock_Origin to version 1.14.4, it > should work with IceCat 52.1.0. Just to make a small note: It also works with the 1.13.7.rc4 beta version of

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock Origins 1.14.0 incompatible with IceCat 52.1.0

2017-09-02 Thread Felix Fröhlich
Great, thanks for the quick response! On 02/09/17 06:51, David Hedlund wrote: > > This was quickly solved after I discussed with the author. I updated > https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/UBlock_Origin to version 1.14.4, it > should work with IceCat 52.1.0. > > > > On 2017-09-02 00:06, Felix Fröhlich