On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:59:41 -0400 Mark wrote:
> I honestly don't know how to engage with IceCat upstream
as i mentioned in my previous post, we had some discussion a
few months ago about setting up a communication channel for
anyone interested in maintenance of liberated mozilla browsers
to use
Hi,
bill-auger writes:
> that specific concern is only one symptom of the current
> situation - at the root of it, is the fact that there is often a
> significant amount of work involved to prepare each new release
> of these browsers;
Significant work is needed only when updating to a new
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, bug-gnuzilla-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Send bug-gnuzilla mailing list submissions to
bug-gnuzilla@gnu.org
[cut for brevity]
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Up-to-date IceCat source tarballs now available via GNU
Guix (i...@dantalion.nl)
2. Re: Up-to-date IceCat
that specific concern is only one symptom of the current
situation - at the root of it, is the fact that there is often a
significant amount of work involved to prepare each new release
of these browsers; and the gnuzilla project is currently
under-staffed, and asking for contributors - that has
Hello everyone,
This is my first message on this ml so bare with me. It has been a few
weeks since the Firefox CVE was detailed and a fix was released,
however, the binary and source distributions for Icecat have not been
updated. Effectively a very large portion of the Icecat users will be
