El 28/11/19 a les 19:53, Ian Kelling ha escrit: > > Narcis Garcia via GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla@gnu.org> writes: > >> El 25/11/19 a les 18:36, Mark H Weaver ha escrit: >>> Hi Narcis, >>> >>> Narcis Garcia <informat...@actiu.net> wrote: >>>> El 24/11/19 a les 19:05, Jason Self ha escrit: >>>>> Mailman does add theList-id header, indicating >>>>> >>>>> List-id: GNUzilla bug reports <bug-gnuzilla.gnu.org> >>>>> >>>>> Which should make it possible for your mail program to do whatever one >>>>> wants with such messages. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I've tried by headers already, and it seems not possible with, for >>>> example, Mozilla Thunderbird (custom header does not work in a filter >>>> rule). >>> >>> Are you certain of this? I did a web search found a description of how >>> to filter on custom headers for mail accounts in Thunderbird. I tried >>> it on a friend's instance of Thunderbird. These are the steps I >>> followed: >>> >>> * From the app menu I chose the "Message Filters" menu item, which >>> summoned the Message Filters window. >>> >>> * I clicked the "New..." button, which summoned the Filter Rules window. >>> >>> * I clicked the popup menu of headers to filter on, and down at the >>> bottom of the list I see "Customize...". Choosing it summons the >>> Customize Headers window. I typed "List-id" in the text box and >>> clicked "Add", and then "OK" to dismiss the Customize Headers window. >>> >>> * "List-id" is now an item within the popup menu of headers to filter >>> on. >>> >>> Does this work for you? >> >> No, it doesn't. >> Even worse: replies like yours (not arriving me through list mailer >> because of CC recipient) are impossible to filter with any distinction >> about gnuzilla. >> >> List administrators did become crazy to attend DKIM requirements. If >> DMARC and SPF is used, DKIM doesn't enhance mail at all and list mailers >> can edit subjects and put footers. >> > > Not breaking dkim is the only way we can forward your message and comply > with a strict dmarc policy, well unless you put the gnu lists mail > server into your spf policy. If you use dmarc without dkim (and dont put > us in your spf policy), I consider your server to be misconfigured. >
Anyway, many list administrators are getting new policies around DKIM, that will drive mailing lists to death. The new problem is about usability.