Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat vs Icecat mobile behavior

The only blocker in use is the built-in spyBlock extension. I assumed this add-on would use the same list on mobile or desktop. The only change is I’ve added the malware domains(dot)com subscription. > On Dec 24, 2017, at 16:50, Mart Rootamm wrote: > > Hi, Brennan. > >

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat vs Icecat mobile behavior

Hi, Brennan. If and what kind of blocker extension do you use in mobile IceCat? Are its blocklists updated? Are there any OS-level blocker apps installed, such as Adblock Plus? -M. 2017-12-19 23:11 GMT +02:00, Brennan : > Hi all, > > I’ve been using Icecat on desktop for

[Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat vs Icecat mobile behavior

Hi all, I’ve been using Icecat on desktop for quite some time, and just recently began using it on android. I noticed some ads are coming through on mobile, but not on desktop. Is there a difference in the block lists being implemented in the mobile vs. desktop versions of Icecat? Is there