You an now click on "Votes" and add your vote(s) on
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49607
On 2016-09-27 04:51, mdn wrote:
I don't understand what's the problems with cookies options.
To understand my POV I'll explain what's my experience.
I understood the problems with cookies
agreed 100%
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
https://tutanota.com
23. Sep 2016 13:51 by d...@runbox.com:
> AFTER fixing the security bugs to make IceCat SAFE TO USE AT ALL.
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 19:37:07 +0200, Narcis Garcia <>
Do you see the agenda here? we are being attacked by shills. this is why there
is suddenly so much (politics) here. they do not approve of GNU
icecat. just like ((they) do not approve of GMO labeling, or laws that
protect the second amendment, or anything that upholds
I don't understand what's the problems with cookies options.
To understand my POV I'll explain what's my experience.
I understood the problems with cookies since 2003/2004.
So in that time each time I used a browser I deleted all info in it.
Never had trouble navigating and I didn't refuse any
The only fault I see in Cookie Monster is the lack of an "About" option
to see version & license.
Cookie Monster is oriented in the best way I believe: the 3rd party and
the domains
Cookies are not simply cookies: the bad ones are set from different
origins than user has asked to visit.
eBay,
How I handle it: Accept cookies, accept third-party cookies, clear cookies when
you close the browser.
--
-Dan Q
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:22:46 +0200, David Hedlund wrote:
> >Cookie Monster (CM) rejects 3rd-party cookies by default so you have
> to whitelist a lot of
> David, have you tried "Cookie Monster", or any other similar add-on?
This is my conclusion regarding cookie add-ons that I evaluated in
https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:IceCat_extensions_(proposed)
* I use Self-destructing cookies as recommended in the link mentioned
"something that nobody uses"
-> Your statistics source?
Mozilla removal of "cookies askings" is inspired on legal obligation for
websites about asking every visitor.
Mozilla shifts its responsibility to websites, and allows websites to
fulfill their way in a more or less suitable interaction with
"Daniel Quintiliani" writes:
> Why is everyone so opposed to an addon for something that nobody uses?
> I can't imagine anyone clicking 20 dialog boxes per each loaded banner
> ad. So opposed to using an addon that they are unwilling to update
> serious security problems in
Why is everyone so opposed to an addon for something that nobody uses? I can't
imagine anyone clicking 20 dialog boxes per each loaded banner ad. So opposed
to using an addon that they are unwilling to update serious security problems
in software?
All I know is that all of this politics is
David Hedlund wrote:
> Consider to keep the code for cookies "ask me every time" from Firefox 43
> for IceCat 45.
Concur. This is a must-have feature, and one that should not have been
removed in the first place. If that functionality is kept in IceCat 45,
then there would certainly be more
+1
El 23/09/16 a les 03:12, David Hedlund ha escrit:
> From https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1118394
>
> hi, the ask anytime option for cookies was removed in firefox 44, which
> was supposed to happen for a long time (bug 606655).
>
> i would recommend the following setup instead:
From https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1118394
hi, the ask anytime option for cookies was removed in firefox 44, which
was supposed to happen for a long time (bug 606655).
i would recommend the following setup instead: in the custom history
options choose "keep until i close
13 matches
Mail list logo