Mark I don't appreciate how you want to make yourself appear high and mighty
and unbiased but at the end you say "Please, everyone, stop feeding the
trolls." as if you could never consider the possiblity that I'm anything but.
really hurts even coming from a stranger.
25. Mar 2017 15:31 by
I could say the exact same things about you. I invite everyone to read the
entire history of all the emails I have been a part of. you can clearly see my
good intent and where I'm coming from. you haven't seen the horrors that I've
seen. you haven't seen what agents looks like. they have torn
How dare you call me a troll. because you disagree with me? you only seek to
discredit me because you don't like what I say. you're nothing different than
an internet social justice warrior. please do not message me again.
24. Mar 2017 22:08 by m...@netris.org:
> Go away troll, or else I'll
Jens Lody writes:
> As long as others answer to your mails (as I do at the moment), it's
> not possible to "mark you as spam". To much broken threads would be the
> result.
>
> You behave like a classical agent provocateur and if I would follow you
> own arguments, I could
asleepyet wrote:
"everyone = me?" me me or you me? please clarify.
I meant me but now I'm not the only one...
-but they all fail to mention the important details like how extremely slow
it is
I'm sure they would welcome your expert engineering skills if you'd like to
join the project.
it's
Go away troll, or else I'll take steps to ban you from this list.
This is your final warning.
Mark
writes:
> I see what you're doing here, you're playing game of questions with me
> and being very evasive while pretending to have no idea what I am
> talking about,
oh, playing nice now? I knew you wouldn't mark me as spam. you want to continue
this game, what a surprise.
24. Mar 2017 18:59 by onp...@riseup.net:
>
> I'm afraid I won't argue with unsubstantiated speculation. However, if you
> would like to answer the questions I have asked, that will get
I'm afraid I won't argue with unsubstantiated speculation. However, if you
would like to answer the questions I have asked, that will get us on track
toward a proper debate based on evidence.
--
Julie Marchant
https://onpon4.github.io
On Mar 24, 2017 6:41 PM, awake...@tutanota.de wrote:
>
> I
"everyone = me?" me me or you me? please clarify.
-but they all fail to mention the important details like how extremely slow it
is
"it has many layers -- like an onion."
Oh yea Donkeh lets hang out at mah Swamp woo lets get all Shrek in here
(because that's a good explanation and suddenly
I see what you're doing here, you're playing game of questions with me and
being very evasive while pretending to have no idea what I am talking about,
while also simultaneously giving yourself the unfounded excuse to back up your
own flawed argument that "I'm wrong" for "no mentioned facts or
asleepyet wrote:
> I love it how everyone is mentioning TOR
everyone = me
> but they all fail to mention the important details like how extremely slow it
> is,
it has many layers -- like an onion.
> the lack of functionality,
it's just a network. what extra functionality are you hoping to
On 03/24/2017 07:09 AM, awake...@tutanota.de wrote:
> I point out your missteps in logic
Where did you do this, and what "missteps in logic" are you talking about?
> you suddenly shift your argument if I may call it that to the opposite of
> what you appeared to originally intend to say.
What
I keep trying to look but there's alot of trouble in the way. I personally
consider it very unwise to put a smile on in this sort of moment and pretend
everything is fine when there are clearly unresolved issues. turning away from
the problem and allowing it to grow would be like ignoring the
I wholeheartedly agree with what you are saying but it isn't as simple as need
and availability with users and icecat.
we are like the rebels in starwars. giant corporations and their own search
engines and browsers outnumber us and icecat like 20 deathstars to an xwing and
a few people who
I love it how everyone is mentioning TOR but they all fail to mention the
important details like how extremely slow it is, the lack of functionality, and
how many times it has been compromised. thanks for the suggestion but I'm very
proud of what the creators of icecat have done.
19. Mar 2017
So others are allowed to make points, but if I dare make a point that threatens
their logic, and pops their percieved bubble of safety, I'm suddenly a "classic
troll".
I mention gamergate as well as other things because they are related. I doesn't
take much effort to understand how truly
Absolutely right. Everyone should calm down and look at the common
greater good. Thank you for your appreciative words.
Oh, and to everyone who helped to develop Icecat and other open source
software: THANK YOU, YOU PEOPLE ARE AWESOME.
Am 20.03.17 um 16:13 schrieb
I see what you're saying, awakeyet. From a certain perspective, you make
perfect sense. Attempting to bog down the maintainer of a project like GNU
IceCat to try and take it down is something I could see a competitor doing. I
won't argue that there are rotten people that do pull shady,
+1
El 19/03/17 a les 01:18, Julie Marchant ha escrit:
> Libre software is about freedom to control your computing, not freedom
> to choose a proprietary OS. The FSF supports compiling for Windows
> because it helps users to transition to libre software.
>
> Attacking users for making a bad
On Sunday, March 19, 2017 19:34:28 awake...@tutanota.de wrote:
>> "Also, even the FSF supports building software for Windows."
> yes yes and linux has systemd. truly imperfect world we live in.
awake...@tutanota.de, julie is making a pertinent point: no one was arguing
with you in this forum
Libre software is about freedom to control your computing, not freedom to
choose a proprietary OS. The FSF supports compiling for Windows because it
helps users to transition to libre software.
Attacking users for making a bad decision (Windows) is unproductive and
hurtful, but not directly at
It's funny, GNU is about freedom of choice, yet just about every message I
read has people trampling over others choice of operating system.
It's appalling to read almost every day these arguments. Yes, sometimes
it's hard to support different platforms. I'm a software engineer myself,
so I know
I will respect that, as I always have. I sense deep treachery however. I don't
mean to personally attack but people need to be aware that something is
definitely going on. my radar is ringing off the scale. the reply from "Daniel
Quintiliani пишет:" reads word for word like a
Don't violate the forum rules. We are not here to judge why people who
use proprietary OS's, this forum is for IceCat only. Please respect that.
using icecat on a closed source operating system is like eating
burgers and pizza and donuts 6 days a week and on the seventh day you
eat one salad
Please don't be offensive in here.
I sympathize with Dan that the release schedules have lost control. But you are
right too Sedovanr, there are only a few developers for IceCat, however, the
team is about to expand.
On 16 March 2017 15:32:35 CET, Sedov Andrey wrote:
>You
You talk a lot. Talk about the empty and unnecessary. The number of
Icecat developers is small and they are right that they do not spend
their time on unnecessary things. Want for a useless thing - support
spyware OS Windows, DO!
Develop your code for IceCat, and do not make claims and whims
And I am getting more and more satisfied with icecat. I have critiqued the
release schedule in the past, but I came to understand that developers need to
strike a balance between upstream updates and downstream fixes, which are
often just as important. And since I don't understand any of the
27 matches
Mail list logo