[bug #58653] Please add back in the mdoc(7) manual

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #58653 (project groff): [comment #3 comment #3:] > You say "but beginners need something simpler". I contest that. It's not because i'm an expert on mdoc(7). When learning a completely new language totally from scratch, i typically go for the formal standard / formal

[bug #58653] Please add back in the mdoc(7) manual

URL: Summary: Please add back in the mdoc(7) manual Project: GNU troff Submitted by: hackerb9 Submitted on: Wed 24 Jun 2020 10:13:31 PM UTC Category: Macro - mdoc

[bug #58653] Please add back in the mdoc(7) manual

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #58653 (project groff): [comment #5 comment #5:] > > > This mandoc mdoc(7) you are speaking of, > > is it part of groff? I don't see it. > > No it isn't. > I already posted the hyperlink: https://man.openbsd.org/mdoc.7 > It is part of mandoc. Please pardon my

[bug #58653] Please add back in the mdoc(7) manual

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #58653 (project groff): [comment #1 comment #1:] > I *VERY* strongly oppose this idea. Thank you, Ingo, although I do wish you had mentioned this on the mailing list when I first brought it up or at the point when someone else suggested that the groff project needs to

[bug #61043] potential integer overflow vulnerability in src/preproc/grn/hdb.cpp

URL: Summary: potential integer overflow vulnerability in src/preproc/grn/hdb.cpp Project: GNU troff Submitted by: eqkws Submitted on: Sun 15 Aug 2021 06:03:08 AM UTC Category: None

[bug #58653] want the short mdoc(7) page that Linux man-pages used to ship

Follow-up Comment #11, bug #58653 (project groff): [comment #10 comment #10:] > It looks like nobody has the desire to resolve this as the submitter requested. > > I would point out, however, that since last updating this ticket over a year ago, I have significantly revised the opening sections