Hi Branden,
G. Branden Robinson wrote on Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 02:42:27AM -0400:
> Follow-up Comment #6, bug #53547 (project groff):
>
> I did not find any need for this:
>
> \# The next argument must be longer than the indent from .TP (8n)
>
> or the spaces they refer to, nor for the
Caveat: I haven't made a commit in a few months, so apply due weight to
my opinion.
At 2018-04-15T04:08:28+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Bjarni,
>
> i don't have the time to read your long-winded rants, and i doubt
> that others have.
Personally I appreciate the amount of spit and polish Bjarni
Bjarni,
i don't have the time to read your long-winded rants, and i doubt
that others have.
Please go away.
The point of my reply to this ticket was that wading through such
tickets to find whether anything of value is hidden in them is not
worth the time and effort it requires. Quite
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:42:31PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Please stop clobbering the bugtracker with low-quality reports of
> this kind.
What is this low-quality? Explain.
What is "this kind"?
I am not doing this (clobbering).
Direct your complaint to the right addresses,
namely
Please stop clobbering the bugtracker with low-quality reports of
this kind. The "Details:" section of your report is inscrutable
gibberish, some of the content - as far as it can be guessed what
it is supposed to mean - is obvious bogus advice, some of it is of
very little importance (like the
