At 29 Oct 2002 10:19:03 -0500,
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> I certainly appreciate these arguments, however, I would appreciate it
> (as I think would others) if you could briefly enumerate what
> separates bugcomm from the others. That is, which design issues does
> bugcomm try to correct; just call
> IMHO, if the design of a software package sucks, it isn't worth
> improving, even if the implementation is elegant, beautiful, simple,
> and smart. Especially when the goal is different from yours, there is
> no point where you can contribute.
>
> That's why I started BugCommunicator. I surveyed
> When I was a young programmer, I thought code was the most
> important. But I considered what made GRUB so nice, and I realized there
> was a much more important thing, that is to say, a design. How to design
> a software package is a much bigger problem than how to
> implement it.
This is absol
At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:51:42 +0100 (CET),
Dr. Tilmann Bubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, nothing in particular is bad with bugcomm. The only thing is, that
> there are already a large number of bug reporting tools. If there is a
> special thing, which you don't like about the existing tools,
> At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:14:27 +0100 (CET),
> Dr. Tilmann Bubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What about bugzilla or mantis (php/mysql)? They are well-known,
>> stable, and have a lot of features?
>
> I'd like to hear your opinion about bugcomm rather than rivals. What is
> bad with bugcomm?
Wel
At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:14:27 +0100 (CET),
Dr. Tilmann Bubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about bugzilla or mantis (php/mysql)? They are well-known, stable,
> and have a lot of features?
I'd like to hear your opinion about bugcomm rather than rivals. What
is bad with bugcomm?
Okuji
___
o say in this mail is that now might be a good time when we
> start using BugCommunicator as a GRUB BTS instead of Savannah's, because
> it is more or less stable during testing, although it still lacks some
> features I want to have. If no one objects, I'll register GRUB on it.
&
nce of NIIBE Yutaka (aka gniibe), BugCommunicator has
a BTS which runs BugCommunicator itself at the URL
<http://bugcomm.enbug.org/>.
What I want to say in this mail is that now might be a good time when
we start using BugCommunicator as a GRUB BTS instead of Savannah's,
because it is more or les
