o: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com>; Ahmed, Safayet (GE Global
> Research, US) <safayet.ah...@ge.com>; Daniel Kiper <daniel.ki...@oracle.com>
Hmmm... It is interesting. I have not received original email...
So, sorry for late reply.
> Cc: bug-grub@gnu.org
> Subject: E
u.org
Subject: EXT: Re: Tag-alignment in multiboot2 image headers
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017, 22:28 Andrei Borzenkov
<arvidj...@gmail.com<mailto:arvidj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Ahmed, Safayet (GE Global Research,
US) <safayet.ah...@ge.com<mailto:safayet.ah
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017, 22:28 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Ahmed, Safayet (GE Global Research,
> US) wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm seeing an inconsistency in the multiboot2 specification and the
> implementation of the
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Ahmed, Safayet (GE Global Research,
US) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm seeing an inconsistency in the multiboot2 specification and the
> implementation of the multiboot2 loader code in GRUB. It may be my
> understanding that's incorrect. A
Hello,
I'm seeing an inconsistency in the multiboot2 specification and the
implementation of the multiboot2 loader code in GRUB. It may be my
understanding that's incorrect. A clarification would be appreciated.
This concerns the alignment requirements for tags in OS image headers. The