Re: stack overflow from 'help' and goops

I think 'help' has trouble with goops entities: guile-oops-0.1.8 is buggy. Please use 0.9.0. Humph! I was using 0.9.0: /home/bil/test/guile-oops-0.9.0/ ./guile-oops guile (use-modules (ice-9 session)) guile (use-modules (oop goops)) guile (goops-version) "0.9.0" guile (help define-class)

segfault from backtrace of do () with unbound variable

guile (version) "1.4" guile (define hi (lambda (a) (do () (( a 6)) (set! a ho guile (hi 2) standard input:1:41: In expression (set! a ho): standard input:1:41: Unbound variable: ho ABORT: (unbound-variable) Type "(backtrace)" to get more information or "(debug)" to enter the debugger. guile

Re: stack overflow from 'help' and goops

Bill Schottstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think 'help' has trouble with goops entities: guile-oops-0.1.8 is buggy. Please use 0.9.0. Humph! I was using 0.9.0: /home/bil/test/guile-oops-0.9.0/ ./guile-oops guile (use-modules (ice-9 session)) guile (use-modules (oop goops))

Re: [PATCH]: Bug with expt

Dirk Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The test for exactness if wrong here: Rationals (if supported) could fulfill that predicate as well. I will apply the following patch: diff -u -r1.208 boot-9.scm --- boot-9.scm 2000/07/01 17:01:22 1.208 +++ boot-9.scm 2000/07/12 07:23:07 @@