Rob Browning writes:
> You can work around the problem by stashing equal? somewhere else, and
> then define-generic will work after a (define equal? #f). Presumably
> you'd then need to define a base specialization using the original
> equal? or do something equivalent.
It looks like while
Version: 2.2.6
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (oop goops))
scheme@(guile-user)> equal?
$1 = #
scheme@(guile-user)> (define-generic equal?)
scheme@(guile-user)> equal?
$2 = #
The same appears to be true for other primitives like + too, but if I'm
reading it right, this makes it
