bug#39266: Finalization thread hits wrong-type-arg on weak vector (AArch64)

2020-03-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Pierre, Pierre Langlois skribis: > I've tested it on AArch64 and it's looking good, I'm running Guile 3 > finally! I've tested by running 'guix pull --branch=wip-guile-3.0.1' on > a rockpro64 running the Guix system, I've then reconfigured and rebooted > and it's all good. Thanks for

bug#40014: [PATCH] typo in api-debug.texi

2020-03-10 Thread Jan Synacek
See attached patch. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat From 8617b6a94054aafc4a58cd1e5581154e1e9ea353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Synacek Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:36:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] texinfo: Fix typo in api-debug.texi --- doc/ref/api-debug.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed,

bug#40008: Backtraces can contain very long strings

2020-03-10 Thread tomas
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:05:24AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: > I have the following backtrace: > > Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1736:10 9 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) > In unknown file: >8 (apply-smob/0 #) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 718:2 7

bug#40008: Backtraces can contain very long strings

2020-03-10 Thread Jan Synacek
I have the following backtrace: Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1736:10 9 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In unknown file: 8 (apply-smob/0 #) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 718:2 7 (call-with-prompt _ _ #) In ice-9/eval.scm: 619:8 6 (_ #(#(#))) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: