Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-15 Thread Marius Vollmer
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Do we say that we don't want to fix `(array? car) => #t)' now because > >> Guile has behaved this way for a while? > > Marius> Yes, exactly. It wont be fixed in the stable branch. > > Sorry again; I didn't realize that we weren't plannin

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-15 Thread Neil Jerram
> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >> I'm not convinced. How can people

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-15 Thread Neil Jerram
> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >> I'm not convinced. How can people

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-15 Thread Marius Vollmer
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> I'm not convinced. How can people be expecting debugging to be turned > >> on after having explicitly said `(debu

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-14 Thread Neil Jerram
> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> I'm not convinced. How can people be expecting debugging to be turned >> on after having explicitly said `(debug-disable 'debug)' in their >> .guile file?

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-14 Thread Marius Vollmer
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the > >> end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-09 Thread Neil Jerram
> "thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: thi>From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thi>Date: 08 Mar 2002 23:53:35 + thi>I'd say it's a bug, and that it would be better to squash it now than thi>to support strange expectations through 1.6.x.

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-08 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 08 Mar 2002 23:53:35 + I'd say it's a bug, and that it would be better to squash it now than to support strange expectations through 1.6.x. it's also a bug in the sense that side-effects on load (except for `define') are usually conside

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-08 Thread Neil Jerram
> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the >> end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there >> any reason why we shoul

Re: Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-08 Thread Marius Vollmer
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the > end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there > any reason why we shouldn't fix it in the same way on the stable > branch? This change would be too far reachi

Bug #1 - (debug-disable 'debug) has no effect ...

2002-03-08 Thread Neil Jerram
This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there any reason why we shouldn't fix it in the same way on the stable branch? Neil ___ Bug-guile mailing lis