Judy Hawkins writes:
>> Unbound variable: let-values*
>
> So, in answer to my own question, it appears that my previous post is
> reporting a documentation bug, as using the spelling let*-values works
> just dandy:
Thanks for reporting and looking into this. In the latest (1.8.7)
release this i
> Unbound variable: let-values*
So, in answer to my own question, it appears that my previous post is reporting
a documentation bug, as using the spelling let*-values works just dandy:
guile> (let*-values (((x y) (values 1 2)) ((n m) (values (+ x x) (+ y y
(list n m))
(2 4)
In the refere
let-values* is mentioned in the documentation for SRFI-11, but
guile> (version)
"1.8.5"
guile> (use-modules (srfi srfi-11))
guile> (let-values* (((x y) (values 1 2))) (list x y))
Backtrace:
In standard input:
3: 0* (let-values* (((x y) (values 1 2))) (list x y))
standard input:3:1: In expre
