Kevin Ryde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. If it's contrary to the spec then it's a bug in guile.
Looks like guile also doesn't make the final predicate application a
tail call the way the spec describes. Not sure how to fix that.
Actually, we can change it so that we handle the last
According to SRFI-13 the procedure string-every returns #t if it is applied
to an empty sequence (see
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-13/srfi-13.html#Predicates). But Guile's
implementation returns #f. Is this a bug in SRFI-13 or in srfi/srfi-13.c?
___
Andreas Vögele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to SRFI-13 the procedure string-every returns #t if it is applied
to an empty sequence (see
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-13/srfi-13.html#Predicates). But Guile's
implementation returns #f. Is this a bug in SRFI-13 or in srfi/srfi-13.c?
