Re: latest cvs and srfi-1 for-each

2003-02-03 Thread Mikael Djurfeldt
Kevin Ryde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In the latest cvs built on a recent i386 debian, srfi-1 for-each seems to have stopped working, * srfi-1.c (srfi1_for_each): Corrected argument checking for the case of two argument lists. (Thanks to Kevin Ryde.)

Re: guile 1.6.3 documentation installation problem, Solaris 8, gcc3.2.1 {PS}

2003-02-03 Thread Marius Vollmer
Andrew Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just tried building up the input file by hand that snarf-check-and-output-texi expects, and running it through snarf-check-and-output-texi to see what it does. The output: $ snarf-check-and-output-texi /tmp/guile-doc ;;; WARNING (no code for

Re: guile 1.6.3 documentation installation problem, Solaris 8, gcc3.2.1 {PS}

2003-02-03 Thread Andrew Koenig
Marius From your build logs, I see that Marius /tmp/build-gnu5877/guile-1.6.3/pre-inst-guile is used, which Marius seems correct. Does pre-inst-guile work on your system? It does the same thing with an empty input file. So it appears that the guile that is built fails to handle