Hi Giuseppe,
Sorry for the late reply.
Giuseppe Scrivano gscriv...@gnu.org writes:
I reported some problems compiling guile with new versions of GCC. The
reason of these problems is that new GCC versions check for declaration
in the current scope that are missed by a goto.
Which version is
On Sep 14, 2009, at 03:37, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Why does it help to move locals to the enclosing scope? I’d expect
the
opposite.
Jumping over the initializer is a simpler analysis than used-before-
set. It may also yield different results, if the goto that branches
into the block and
Hi,
Ken Raeburn raeb...@raeburn.org writes:
In this case, though, nothing after the label uses the value of the
variable for which the initialization is bypassed, so it seems okay.
Though, I'd think the declaration could be left in the same scope, and
just split into a declaration without
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27450
Summary: Fat mutexes not GC'd until their owner dies
Project: Guile
Submitted by: civodul
Submitted on: Mon 14 Sep 2009 10:32:47 PM GMT
Category: None
Severity: 3
