Hi,
Sorry for the delay.
Jan Schukat shoo...@email.de skribis:
ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure #procedure a434b00 at
ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args):
ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure dynamic-pointer: Symbol not
found: scm_init_popen
make[3]: *** [ice-9/popen.go] Error 1
Ok, tried that on linux.
autoreconf demanded automake 1.12, which isn't available via .debs on
ubuntu yet, so I installed that from the sources.
after that I get this error message:
configure.ac:873: warning: macro 'AM_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in library
autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf
Jan Schukat shoo...@email.de skribis:
autoreconf demanded automake 1.12, which isn't available via .debs on
ubuntu yet, so I installed that from the sources.
after that I get this error message:
configure.ac:873: warning: macro 'AM_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in library
autoreconf: running:
Hi Ian,
On Mon 09 Jul 2012 14:29, Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
PARSE ERROR (+InF.0 +inf.0 +inf.0 +Inf.0) = #f
PARSE ERROR (-iNF.0 -inf.0 -inf.0 -Inf.0) = #f
PARSE ERROR (+NAN.0 +nan.0 +nan.0 +NaN.0) = #f
These are not errors. +NAN.0 is not even not a
On Tue 14 Aug 2012 18:14, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
(define-module (foo) #:autoload (does-not-exist) (baz))
(define (chbouib) (baz))
(pk 'hello)
Trying to evaluate it fails this way:
$ guile --no-auto-compile t.scm
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
[...]
292: 3
On Thu 19 Jul 2012 15:22, Daniel Llorens daniel.llor...@bluewin.ch writes:
I was cleaning up an old script which goes like this:
(define (eval-case ...)
...
val)
(define var (eval-case ...))
This worked from the REPL, but when loading the file with (load
script), var was always
On Mon 05 Nov 2012 22:24, Areth Unknown unknown.ar...@gmail.com writes:
This code makes guile segfault, tested in the versions 2.0.6.49 and
2.0.6.66 ..
(define v-blocks (make-vtable pR)) ;; note that this is a protected
tail array read-only
(define block-2 (make-struct v-blocks 1
On Mon 19 Nov 2012 11:38, Daniel Llorens d...@jast.ch writes:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2012-11/msg00032.html
Fixed, with notes in that thread. Thanks again for the report!
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi,
For some reason this mail went just to me instead of to the bug also.
For that reason I'm top-quoting all of it. Anyway, we have had a couple
releases since this report, with lots of fixes. Please open a new bug
for new build errors. Thanks!
Andy
On Sat 07 Jul 2012 23:51, Nelson H. F.
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Mon 09 Jul 2012 14:29, Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
If the number contains a division by zero, we get a numerical overflow
error.
scheme@(guile−user) (string-number 3/0)
ERROR: In procedure string−number:
ERROR: Throw to key
Hello all,
I wrote:
I'm embarrassed to admit that the integration of mini-gmp into guile has
long been waiting on my pending numerics patches. I'll try to get going
on this (and some other things) for the 2.0.8 release.
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10519#8
I've posted a new
I reported:
Guile's peek-char has a bug; it incorrectly *consumes* eof instead of
just reporting it.
Andy Wingo replied:
I have the feeling that for interactive use, if you expect to read a EOF
from a port and then continue, you have to not use peek-char. You need
to handle your own
I think this isn't working as it should either.
scheme@(guile-user) +1i
$1 = 0.0+1.0i
scheme@(guile-user) 1i
;;; unknown-location: warning: possibly unbound variable `#{1i}#'
ERROR: In procedure #procedure 101d6d4a0 ():
ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: #{1i}#
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com skribis:
On Fri 07 Dec 2012 22:59, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Ooh, I see. This is related to commit ed4c3739 (see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2011-12/msg00160.html).
What happens is that the directory name may be correctly decoded
Gettext was installed. Actually I don't know any linux distributions
where it isn't installed by default.
On mingw the latest source snapshot tarball (after taking care of the
struct timespec trouble) ends in a compilation error on I can't really
make any sense off:
SNARF numbers.x
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:49:13PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Mon 09 Jul 2012 14:29, Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
PARSE ERROR (+InF.0 +inf.0 +inf.0 +Inf.0) = #f
PARSE ERROR (-iNF.0 -inf.0 -inf.0 -Inf.0) = #f
PARSE ERROR (+NAN.0 +nan.0
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:04:55PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
FYI, I produced a simple patch a while back to fix this (see below), but
it had an interesting side effect: it caused the reader to read things
like 3/0 and 4+3/0i as symbols. More generally, anything for which
On Wed 06 Mar 2013 06:51, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
What is the meaning of this field?
It's a copy of the C global var ‘scm_mallocated’, which tracks current
allocation (all malloced minus all freed).
There is no such C global var.
We could track total allocations
18 matches
Mail list logo
