Den tors 13 feb. 2020 12:37Ludovic Courtès skrev:
> Yay! It’s nice to see how 7dc90a17e03045c7cd8894b14b027b845b68aa4f is
> short and clear.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
(You're lucky, Ludo', that we don't take that statement literally. :-))
Thanks!
>
Hi Andy,
Andy Wingo skribis:
>> However, 3.0.0 keeps the computation of ‘i’:
>>
> [...]
>> L3:
>> 53(instrument-loop 139)
>> 55(handle-interrupts)
>> 56(call-scm<-scm-uimm 5 5 1 3) at (unknown
>> file):388:11
>> 58
On Wed 12 Feb 2020 12:50, Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello!
>
> Consider this loop:
>
> (let loop ((n (expt 2 18))
> (i 1))
> (unless (zero? n)
> (loop (- n 1)
> (logior 0 (ash i 1)
>
> Guile 2.2 strips away the computation of ‘i’ (it cannot throw, has no
Hello!
Consider this loop:
(let loop ((n (expt 2 18))
(i 1))
(unless (zero? n)
(loop (- n 1)
(logior 0 (ash i 1)
Guile 2.2 strips away the computation of ‘i’ (it cannot throw, has no
side effects, and the result is unused):
--8<---cut
