tant part of the backtrace was scrolled away and I got
confused about the string, as I thought it was part of the output and
started wondering why (display ...) keeps the escaped newlines in the
string.
If this is not considered a bug, please, at least consider it an RFE.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
See attached patch.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
From 8617b6a94054aafc4a58cd1e5581154e1e9ea353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Synacek
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:36:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] texinfo: Fix typo in api-debug.texi
---
doc/ref/api-debug.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed
When I run the following piece of code:
(use-modules (web client))
(http-get "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/rest/bug/1; #:verify-certificate? #f)
I get:
...
In web/client.scm:
563:0 1 (http-get "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/rest/bug/1; # _ # …)
231:6 0 (tls-wrap # _ # _)
With guile-3.0.2:
scheme@(guile-user)> (thunk? (const 1))
$1 = #t
Since thunk is a procedure that does not accept arguments (section
6.9.7, documentation for 'thunk?'), the result of the above evaluation
should be #f.
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 4:09 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> I think this is more a matter of the documentation being not quite right:
>
> -- Scheme Procedure: thunk? obj
> -- C Function: scm_thunk_p (obj)
> Return ‘#t’ if OBJ is a thunk—a procedure that does not accept
> arguments.
>
> "if
In guile-3.0.2 manual, section 6.9.3 Compiled Procedures, there is:
Compiled procedures, also known as “programs”, respond all procedures
that operate on procedures. In addition, there are a few more accessors
for low-level details on programs.
The first compound sentence doesn't make much
Consider the following code snippet running on Guile-3.0.2:
(use-modules (sxml simple)
(sxml xpath))
(define doc
(call-with-input-file "/home/jsynacek/src/xcb-proto-1.13/src/xproto.xml"
(lambda (port)
(xml->sxml port
(define events ((sxpath '(// event)) doc))
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 1:35 PM wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:29:54PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > Consider the following code snippet running on Guile-3.0.2:
>
> [...]
>
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > (event (@ (number 2) (name KeyPress))
>
>
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:36 PM Linus Björnstam
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 16 May 2020, at 14:27, Jan Synacek wrote:
>
> > I don't really have a strong opinion. I simply thought that the order
> > in XML->SXML should be the same. Otherwise, I don't see how sxml-m
This is on guix 1.1.0 running on Fedora 32. I also tried to 'guix pull'
but the result is the same.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
10 matches
Mail list logo
