From d06bfdf01e5b59d3ce377b8634919c889a39c9e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Karetnikov
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:41:53 +
Subject: [PATCH] licenses: Add 'bsd-style', 'expat', 'gpl1', 'gpl1+',
'lgpl2.0', and 'lgpl2.0+'.
* guix/licenses.scm (bsd-style, expat, gpl1, gpl1+)
(lgpl2.0, l
Andreas Enge skribis:
> However, the current behaviour is not consistent with the documentation.
It’s more that the documentation is ahead of time. :-)
Ludo’.
Andreas Enge skribis:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2012 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Anyway, what does work is something like:
>> $ guix-package --profile=$HOME/.guix-profile --install=hello
>
> This worked, but in a rather strange way. .guix-profile did not exist
> yet. It was created as a symbo
Here is a recipe:
(define-public fplll
(package
(name "fplll")
(version "4.0.1")
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append
"http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/damien.stehle/fplll/libfplll-";
version ".tar.gz"))
(sha256 (base32
Patch attached.
Unfortunately, I could not test it yet, since guix-package starts by
building path(s) `/nix/store/9syafc8xvscaywjldyszzgkc8pljwpj6-gcc-cross-
boot0-4.7.2'
although gcc-4.7.2 (without "coss-boot") is already there. How come?
The previous mpc release built without problem without r
See attached patch.
Andreas
--- guix.alt/doc/guix.texi 2012-12-11 21:53:49.0 +0100
+++ guix/doc/guix.texi 2012-12-11 22:20:49.0 +0100
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
@cindex package store
The result of package build functions is @dfn{cached} in the file
system, in a special directory called
Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2012 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2012 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> > Anyway, what does work is something like:
> > $ guix-package --profile=$HOME/.guix-profile --install=hello
>
> This worked, but in a rather strange way.
Well, this is actually not
Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2012 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Anyway, what does work is something like:
> $ guix-package --profile=$HOME/.guix-profile --install=hello
This worked, but in a rather strange way. .guix-profile did not exist
yet. It was created as a symbolic link to the new file
.guix-pr
Hi,
Andreas Enge skribis:
> The command
>guix-package -i hello
> still produces an error, probably related to making the symlinks
> in my own environment:
Yes. Currently ‘guix-package’ expects the default profile to be under
/nix/var/nix/profiles/guix, which typically doesn’t exist, hence
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> WDYT?
>
> That's even better. Why did you use trailing whitespaces?
So there are two spaces after sentence-terminating periods.
Ludo’.
> WDYT?
That's even better. Why did you use trailing whitespaces?
Nikita
> The command
> guix-package -i hello
> still produces an error, probably related to making the symlinks
> in my own environment:
[...]
> ERROR: In procedure symlink:
> ERROR: In procedure symlink: No such file or directory
'./pre-inst-env guix-package -i hello' returns the same backtrace on
m
Hello,
I am getting there! Everything compiled, and there is now a hello package.
Or rather, lots of them. /nix/store contains
1 hello-2.8.tar.gz
3 hello-2.8.tar.gz.drv
3 hello-2.8.tar.gz-guile-builder
2 hello-2.8
2 hello-2.8.drv
2 hello-2.8-guile-builder
Altogether 13 files or directories, with d
Hi,
(This is a follow-up to this message. [1])
>> Also, how should I use it? It's in the
>> 'remotes/origin/nix-integration' branch and I have to work in the
>> 'master' branch.
> Yeah, I hope to merge that branch soon.
You misunderstood my question. I wanted to know how to use it instead
of 'n
Hi,
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> There are two ways to fix the problem. We can create new licenses for
> such packages (e.g. 'bzip2'), but it will be tricky. I propose to use
> the following variable instead:
>
> (define bsd-like
> (license "BSD-like"
>#f
> "This is not a
Hi,
I've found out that we can't use (guix licenses) right now; 'bzip2'
and 'flex' use BSD-like licenses that differ from 'bsd-2', 'bsd-3',
and 'bsd-4'.
There are two ways to fix the problem. We can create new licenses for
such packages (e.g. 'bzip2'), but it will be tricky. I propose to use
the
16 matches
Mail list logo
