Re: Porting to mips64el

2013-01-25 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
> "--disable-shared" "LDFLAGS=-static" Bash doesn't have '--disable-shared'. I used these commands: # export LDFLAGS=-static # ./configure --without-bash-malloc \ --disable-readline \ --disable-history \ --disable-help-builtin \ --disable-

Re: Python and gzip

2013-01-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Andreas Enge skribis: > While trying to add a package to compression.scm, I just added the line > #:use-module (gnu packages python) [...] > 2667: 9 [define-module* (gnu packages python) #:filename ...] > 2642: 8 [resolve-imports ((# # #) (#) (#) (#) ...)] > 2580: 7 [resolve-interface (gnu pa

Python and gzip

2013-01-25 Thread Andreas Enge
While trying to add a package to compression.scm, I just added the line #:use-module (gnu packages python) This results in the following error: Backtrace: In ice-9/eval.scm: 392: 19 [eval # ()] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 2667: 18 [define-module* (gnu packages compression) #:filename ...] 2642: 17 [re

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add Subversion.

2013-01-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Cyril Roelandt skribis: > * gnu/packages/subversion.scm: New file. > * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it. Applied. > + #:use-module (guix licenses) Here I added #:select to avoid the name clash for ‘zlib’. > + (uri (string-append > + > "http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Add SQLite.

2013-01-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Cyril Roelandt skribis: > * gnu/packages/sqlite.scm: New file. > * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it. Applied, thanks. > +(uri (string-append > + > "http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/sqlite.mirror/SQLite%20"; > + version "/sqlite-autoconf-307150

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add lipabr.

2013-01-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Cyril Roelandt skribis: > * gnu/packages/libapr.scm: New file. > * gnu/packages/patches/libapr-skip-getservbyname-test.patch: New file > * Makefile.am: Add them > * gnu/packages/libapr: new variable. Applied both, thanks! Ludo’.

[PATCH 0/4] Add Subversion.

2013-01-25 Thread Cyril Roelandt
Hello ! This patch series adds Subversion and its dependencies, which probably will be useful for other packages as well. Regards, Cyril Roelandt. --- Cyril Roelandt (4): Add lipabr. Add libaprutil. Add SQLite. Add Subversion. Makefile.am|4

[PATCH 4/4] Add Subversion.

2013-01-25 Thread Cyril Roelandt
* gnu/packages/subversion.scm: New file. * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it. --- Makefile.am |1 + gnu/packages/subversion.scm | 59 +++ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/subversion.scm diff --git a/Makefi

[PATCH 3/4] Add SQLite.

2013-01-25 Thread Cyril Roelandt
* gnu/packages/sqlite.scm: New file. * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it. --- Makefile.am |1 + gnu/packages/sqlite.scm | 49 +++ 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/sqlite.scm diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Make

[PATCH 2/4] Add libaprutil.

2013-01-25 Thread Cyril Roelandt
* gnu/packages/libapr: new variable. --- gnu/packages/libapr.scm | 33 + 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/libapr.scm b/gnu/packages/libapr.scm index 36f0e1e..b342e77 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/libapr.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/libapr.scm @@ -

[PATCH 1/4] Add lipabr.

2013-01-25 Thread Cyril Roelandt
* gnu/packages/libapr.scm: New file. * gnu/packages/patches/libapr-skip-getservbyname-test.patch: New file * Makefile.am: Add them --- Makefile.am|2 + gnu/packages/libapr.scm| 58 .../patches/libapr-ski

Re: Rollback problems

2013-01-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nikita Karetnikov skribis: >> 3. More generally, should the history of generations be linear, or >> should it be a DAG like Git commits? > > If the latter is the case, then we can probably use a simple tree. Here > is a related link: [1]. Right, if we went for a tree, each manifest could c

Re: Rollback problems

2013-01-25 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Freitag, 25. Januar 2013 schrieb Alex Sassmannshausen: > I guess a generation would only be destroyed at a junction, not when > moving back and forth in straight lines. > A --> B --> C > You could travel from C back to A and back to C without having to > re-install packages... Yes, that

Re: Rollback problems

2013-01-25 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
> > Let me illustrate.  Suppose these generations: > > > A --> B --> C > > > When doing a roll-back from C, one should obviously get back at B.  At > > that point, C would still be available.  Keeping it around means that > > users can easily switch back to C if B turned out to be less