bug#36634: Virtual Machine Manager (virt-manager)

2019-07-12 Thread Raghav Gururajan
Hello Guix! Unable to create any VMs by installing from any ISO file. The virt-manager gives out the following error: Unable to complete install: 'Unable to read from '/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/machine/cgroup.controllers': No such file or directory' Traceback (most recent call last): File

bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

2019-07-12 Thread Ivan Petkov
> On Jul 12, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > > Yes, this is exactly what happened. I consider this is a feature of Guix, > even though it can feel like a gotcha sometimes. :-) > > We often tend to think of the source URL(s) as an ‘identifier’ of the source > file.

bug#36632: ungoogled-chromium needs font-gnu-freefont-ttf

2019-07-12 Thread Martin Becze
ungoogled-chromium will crash until font-gnu-freefont-ttf is installed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#36590: its done

2019-07-12 Thread Martin Becze
its done

bug#36511: extraneous recompiles of scm files while editing gnu/packages/

2019-07-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Robert Vollmert skribis: > The suggestion was that the default workflow should be to compile the > scheme files using `make`. That does avoid the recompile spam, but: > > - adding a scheme file requires going through > 1. edit Makefile.am > 2. call bootstrap > 3. call configure,

bug#36620: alpine crashes while sending mail

2019-07-12 Thread Jack Hill
Ahoy Guix, As of Guix commit 54278e225e99707c3bd6f9eb37b8906851251b49 alpine crashes while trying to send mail through a Microsoft Office365 SMTP server. The crash happens right after I enter my SMTP password. I've attached the debug output that pine writes when it crashes. I've confirmed

bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services

2019-07-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Howdy! zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hi, >> >> zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: >> >>> This issue is described in more detail at [1]. Essentially, 'guix >>> deploy' is will happily load and start new

bug#36594: No hint for missing argument

2019-07-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Julien Lepiller skribis: > Le Thu, 11 Jul 2019 22:40:58 +0200, > Ludovic Courtès a écrit : [...] >> Currently it says: >> >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> $ guix build --help | grep -e -verbo >> -v, --verbosity=LEVEL use the given verbosity LEVEL >>

bug#36014: [PATCH] Attempt to use console-fonts not provided by kbd if they are installed

2019-07-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi John, John Soo skribis: > Ok so I tried your suggestion and it works! I’m so surprised but I think I’ll > update the docs to reflect this possibility instead of the current patch. That’s a good idea, thank you! Ludo’.

bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

2019-07-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: Caused by: No space left on device (os error 28) Eh, never mind, I managed to copy, paste, & send an entire e-mail while missing this line. , T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

2019-07-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Ivan, On Jul 12, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: I've gone ahead and pushed a fix since the signature checked out. I'm closing this bug for now... Unfortunately, the build still fails for me. See below. Kind regards, T G-R --8<---cut

bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

2019-07-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Ivan, Ivan Petkov wrote: My apologies, this was all partly my fault. I do have the old source lying around, diffing the two (attached) reveals that the changelog and one source file actually changed. A bit more detailed context: The rust project makes pre-release sources available for

bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

2019-07-12 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:33:50AM -0700, Ivan Petkov wrote: > A bit more detailed context: > The rust project makes pre-release sources available for testing ahead of > the formal release, and the process is meant to shake out any potential bugs. > I tested with the prerelease build originally,

bug#36466: guix pull --delete-generations

2019-07-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Raghav Gururajan skribis: >> Good catch! This bug should now be fixed by >> 5c3d44303e1bb75d45334af5cf86cde723da0371. >> >> Could you check if it works for you? > > Thank you very much. It worked. Phew! 5GB of data in user and 3GB of > data in root; was removed by `guix gc

bug#36199: Newsboat: HTTPS urls broken

2019-07-12 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
Robert, Robert Smith writes: [...] > Today I tried newsboat for the first time since my last > email and I was surprised to find that the issue has been > completely fixed. Glad you resolved this, I'm closing this bug now. > Thanks again for your help! You are wellcome! Happy Guix! Gio'

bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

2019-07-12 Thread Ivan Petkov
> On Jul 12, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > > Since release archives are signed that would imply some horrible things about > their key management, so I doubt it very much. I guess we'll find out. > > I've gone ahead and pushed a fix since the signature checked out. I'm

bug#36014: [PATCH] Attempt to use console-fonts not provided by kbd if they are installed

2019-07-12 Thread John Soo
Ok so I tried your suggestion and it works! I’m so surprised but I think I’ll update the docs to reflect this possibility instead of the current patch. - John > On Jul 11, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi John, > > John Soo skribis: > >> I looked hard at a nicer way to

bug#35521: Mariadb test suite failures on x86_64-linux

2019-07-12 Thread Marius Bakke
Marius Bakke writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Chris Marusich writes: >>> Hi, I've been encountering this failure off and on for a few weeks now, and I'd like to help fix it. In short, it seems like non-deterministic test

bug#36611: Installation of a new guix system -- summaries of the issues

2019-07-12 Thread racin
Hello (Julien, Sorry I cannot answer to your email as my provider rejected it for no reason; I read you through the web archives) I checked: fsck does not report any error. It is posssible that I have tried to install several packages in parallel (I do this all the time with apt, but it

bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

2019-07-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Pierre, Ivan, Pierre Langlois wrote: From https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz... downloading from https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz... rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz 147.5MiB 1.6MiB/s 01:35 [##] 100.0% sha256 hash mismatch for

bug#36614: Acknowledgement (rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.)

2019-07-12 Thread Pierre Langlois
Thanks Tobias for fixing this! Pierre

bug#36611: Installation of a new guix system -- summaries of the issues

2019-07-12 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 12 juillet 2019 11:29:49 GMT+02:00, Julien Lepiller a écrit : >Le 12 juillet 2019 11:04:00 GMT+02:00, ra...@free.fr a écrit : >>(Cross-posting to help-guix as it may be more appropriate) >> >>I now have two additional issues: >> >>13. My profile disappeared once again and guix package does

bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

2019-07-12 Thread Pierre Langlois
Hello Guix! It looks like the hash for the new rust 1.36 is wrong, I get the following: ~~~ $ guix build rust building /gnu/store/37wfhzp1yqm9w4vq0dhmy6bg3ajaa9yh-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.drv... Starting download of /gnu/store/jm9xvf6qy4zxkb7rkmpz8ygf55l8v8v5-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz >From

bug#36611: Installation of a new guix system -- summaries of the issues

2019-07-12 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 12 juillet 2019 11:04:00 GMT+02:00, ra...@free.fr a écrit : >(Cross-posting to help-guix as it may be more appropriate) > >I now have two additional issues: > >13. My profile disappeared once again and guix package does not work >anymore (it says "guix package: error: unsupported manifest

bug#36611: Installation of a new guix system -- summaries of the issues

2019-07-12 Thread racin
(Cross-posting to help-guix as it may be more appropriate) I now have two additional issues: 13. My profile disappeared once again and guix package does not work anymore (it says "guix package: error: unsupported manifest format"). I realize that my .guix-profile/etc/profile file has been

bug#35521: Mariadb test suite failures on x86_64-linux

2019-07-12 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
Hi Marius, Marius Bakke writes: [...] > Looking further into the changes between 10.1.37 and 10.1.38, I notice > the 'tokudb.*' tests were enabled: > > https://github.com/MariaDB/server/commit/4c490d6df63695dc97b2c808e59954e6877d3a51 The very first thing I noticed lookng at that commit is

bug#35521: Mariadb test suite failures on x86_64-linux

2019-07-12 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
Hi all, for what it counts I Ludovic Courtès writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: [...] >> I'm concerned by how frequently and casually we simply disable failing >> tests. I disagree here: disabling in Guix tests is _never_ done casually AFAIS (as far as I see) but always ponderated and

bug#36511: extraneous recompiles of scm files while editing gnu/packages/

2019-07-12 Thread Robert Vollmert
> On 9. Jul 2019, at 17:45, Robert Vollmert wrote: > > I’ve applied your patch and am testing it now. At first glance it doesn’t > improve the situation, compare the output below of running `guix build -L .` > similar to before, after having edited check.scm. Things do seem to work stably

bug#36511: extraneous recompiles of scm files while editing gnu/packages/

2019-07-12 Thread Robert Vollmert
One further data-point, not immediately related to the recompile spam, but to the proposed work-around when working within the guix repository: The suggestion was that the default workflow should be to compile the scheme files using `make`. That does avoid the recompile spam, but: - adding a

bug#36584: [Mumi] issues.guix.gnu.org doesn't mention bug-guix@

2019-07-12 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Tobias, it now mentions bug-guix. -- Ricardo