bug#36438: git-fetch issue

Le 17 juillet 2019 22:00:43 GMT+02:00, "Ludovic Courtès" a écrit : >Hello, > >Julien Lepiller skribis: > >> HEAD is now at 2f47e30a1a1 Fixed UnsupportedOperationException when a >> namespace is used in place of an expression. warning: failed to >> delete .git/refs/tags/rc1.0.0-IJ143-5-143.???207

bug#36109: GNU Privacy Assistant

Apart from the errors showed on the GUI, running gpa via terminal shows following additional error messages: ** Message: 23:11:17.193: tool to start the agent is not available ** Message: 23:11:20.515: error connecting an UI server: Invalid value passed to IPC - assuming not running Regards, RG.

bug#36711: transformation 'with-source' had no effect on local git checkout directory

I could not find this bug in the archives. This bug seems a bit inconsistent. How to reproduce: Note that I use a variable after I discovered this does not happen with some packages. my_package=guile-git 1. clone any repository referenced by a package: git clone https://gitlab.com/guile-gi

bug#36509: guix pull: too many substitute updates, or bad log messages

Hi, Robert Vollmert skribis: > When running `guix pull`, output like the following is common > for me: > > $ guix pull > Updating channel 'puzzlink' from Git repository at '/home/rob/guix-puzzlink'… > […] > Building from these channels: > guix https://github.com/robx/guix.git 11f68b3 > [

bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents)

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > I have confirmed that this is the problem by replacing “while > (VMFile.exists(file.path))” with “while (false)”. The build doesn’t > fully complete then either, but it gets past the compilation of the Ant > source files. This clears JamVM and Jikes. It doesn’t. VMFi

bug#36706: "guix gc --verify" fails with "FOREIGN KEY constraint failed"

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:02 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > This is bad and you cannot recover from it. The store should *never* be > edited manually as it will become inconsistent with the database (which > I assume you have not edited). > I recovered it just fine with a quick&dirty: $ sqlite3 /

bug#36380: related article (Debian)

Just ran across this article about Debian dealing with similar issues. https://daniel-lange.com/archives/152-hello-buster.html One of the suggested work-arounds is to rely on virtio_rng on virtual machines, but it seems Guix already uses that on my machine, so perhaps it doesn’t help: rob@garp ~

bug#36708: guix.gnu.org/packages is 6 weeks stale, claims recent update

Mark H Weaver writes: > As I write this, is over 6 weeks stale, > but claims to have been updated two days ago, on July 15: > > "GNU Guix provides 9,789 packages transparently available as pre-built > binaries. These pages provide a complete list of the pack

bug#36706: "guix gc --verify" fails with "FOREIGN KEY constraint failed"

Ingo Ruhnke writes: > I am using guix on Ubuntu 19.04, due to some unrelated BTRFS problems I > needed to free some space and did a quick: > > $ rm -rv /gnu/store/*libreoff* This is bad and you cannot recover from it. The store should *never* be edited manually as it will become inconsist

bug#36438: git-fetch issue

Hello, Julien Lepiller skribis: > HEAD is now at 2f47e30a1a1 Fixed UnsupportedOperationException when a > namespace is used in place of an expression. warning: failed to > delete .git/refs/tags/rc1.0.0-IJ143-5-143.???2072: No such file or > directory warning: failed to > delete .git/refs/tags/1.

bug#36708: guix.gnu.org/packages is 6 weeks stale, claims recent update

Mark H Weaver writes: > As I write this, is over 6 weeks stale, > but claims to have been updated two days ago, on July 15: > > "GNU Guix provides 9,789 packages transparently available as pre-built > binaries. These pages provide a complete list of the pack

bug#36710: emacs-org build failure

Hi Guix, On my local system emacs-org fails to build with the following output using $ guix describe Generation 6Jul 17 2019 15:11:42(current) guix 82ccfb1 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 82ccfb1d9464c8487bbb2eb4f5871b8fdb5

bug#36684: "View build log" - but it's empty (at first)!

Hi Chris, Chris Marusich skribis: > Whoops, I got my wires crossed. Those build logs are for > evolution-data-server, not ant-bootstrap. However, the same problem > holds for evolution-data-server - I built it, it failed, it said I could > find the logs at > /var/log/guix/drvs/7f/n896phqyv9r63

bug#36640: guix pull compile-files failure doesn't identify failed file

Hi, Robert Vollmert skribis: > Specifically, building guix-packages.drv locally, I got the output below. > As far as I can tell, the problematic file’s name is not contained in the > output at all. The file is certainly available where we call compile-file > — no idea whether it would be better

bug#36708: Serving an up-to-date https://guix.gnu.org/packages

Hello Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > As I write this, is over 6 weeks stale, As I wrote to guix-sysadmin: The package list at is made from the current ‘guix’ package, not from the latest ‘master’. We should work to buil

bug#36708: guix.gnu.org/packages is 6 weeks stale, claims recent update

As I write this, is over 6 weeks stale, but claims to have been updated two days ago, on July 15: "GNU Guix provides 9,789 packages transparently available as pre-built binaries. These pages provide a complete list of the packages. Our continuous integration

bug#36706: "guix gc --verify" fails with "FOREIGN KEY constraint failed"

I am using guix on Ubuntu 19.04, due to some unrelated BTRFS problems I needed to free some space and did a quick: $ rm -rv /gnu/store/*libreoff* This expectedly confuses guix a little and leads to error messages such as this which make it impossible to reinstall any packages: $ guix ins

bug#36084: not really fixed?

It seems the two clock packages are still subtly different, apparently due to the tested variant pulling in a dependency on the test libraries. Compare https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36705. Configuring tasty-hspec-1.1.5.1... Warning: This package indirectly depends on multiple

bug#36685: ant-bootstrap fails on core-updates (409 dependents)

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > However, this doesn’t seem to help. Yes, the bootstrap script no longer > aborts but it gets stuck compiling things. I can’t get it to tell me > anything about the compilation progress, but strace shows me that it > keeps stat’ing for non-existent files like "/tmp/file