bug#42286: SWH fallback fails (git-fetch)

Hi, On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 00:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > zimoun skribis: > >> Trying to download from Software Heritage... >> Backtrace: >>4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/s56y8npabah6jc1bqrhsac6wqb1?") >> In ./guix/swh.scm: >>573:13 3 (swh-download

bug#42291: data service: Show list of files and allow qeuerying

Hi On +2020-07-09 11:25:05 +0200, zimoun wrote: > Dear, > > +Pierre because I am not sure he reads carefully debuugs. ;-) > > On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 at 10:13, Hartmut Goebel > wrote: > > Serverity: wishlist > > I often find myself checking the content of a package. For this I > > would like to

bug#42301: Build of GNU Solfege fails

GNU Solfege 3.22.2 refuses to build. Here is what I believe is the relevant part of the log file: Converting to PNG...LC_ALL=C makeinfo -I topdocs --no-split --no-headers --output FAQ topdocs/FAQ.texi utf8 "\xF6" does not map to Unicode at

bug#42212: Guix version rendered as 0.0-git in info manual

Hi Arun, Arun Isaac skribis: > In the info manual, the Guix version is rendered as 0.0-git. For > example, in "(guix) The Store", see "The ability to connect to remote > build daemons is considered experimental as of 0.0-git". I am running > the Guix standalone system. Any idea what's going

bug#42247: Channel news raise error on `guix pull`

Hi, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > However, guix pull chokes on it: > > (repl-version 0 0) > (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value > (channel-news)) (value #f)) This suggests that the ‘news.scm’ file of your channel is being picked up and evaluated as if it

bug#42286: SWH fallback fails (git-fetch)

Hi! zimoun skribis: > Trying to download from Software Heritage... > Backtrace: >4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/s56y8npabah6jc1bqrhsac6wqb1?") > In ./guix/swh.scm: >573:13 3 (swh-download "https://github.com/zimoun/hello-example?; ?) >224:22 2 (call

bug#42299: ‘guix lint’ should suggest CPE name

Hello! On IRC earlier today we were looking at and wondering about the CPE suggestions (which are nice!). I tried the attached hack, which produces a few useless and sometimes erroneous suggestions, by comparing the “references” of each CVE

bug#42298: Nonexistent Git commit referenced from current Guix package

The current Guix package points to a Git commit that does not exist, which breaks the ability to build the package. The current package version is '1.1.0-16.d3eee3c'. That commit d3eee3c [0] is the commit that updated the Guix package previously, to '1.1.0-15.03deb1e'. However, there is no

bug#42286: SWH fallback fails (git-fetch)

On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 02:39, zimoun wrote: Well, "swh-download" perfectly works directly from the REPL. > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > guix build -L . hi [...] > Trying to download from Software Heritage... > Backtrace: >4 (primitive-load

bug#42289: recursive import does not dort alphabetically

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:26:03PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Most file I've been working on ask for sorting alphabetically. (And IMHO > this is a good recommendation to follow.) What are the benefits of sorting packages? The ordering of packages is not usually important to the machine, and

bug#26302: Deploying the i18n’d web site

pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) writes: > Sorry, I forgot to address the patch tracker. I wrote some hours ago: > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 07:31:04PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 05:27:05PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> > Hi Florian, >> > >> > "pelzflorian

bug#26302: Deploying the i18n’d web site

The trouble is that I do not have an understanding in what order nginx tries which redirections/rewrites. An understanding is needed instead of investigating dead ends and 3rd party nginx modules. What I have done a while ago (the berlin patch for guix-maintenance from my last e-mail contains

bug#42289: recursive import does not dort alphabetically

On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 13:26, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > > Because they are generally not alphabetically sorted. > > Most file I've been working on ask for sorting alphabetically. (And IMHO > this is a good recommendation to follow.) Well, I get: 295 gnu/packages/unsorted-file.scm 204

bug#24140: Substitute hash mismatches not properly reported

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > When using ‘guix package’, upon a substitute hash mismatch, all we see > is something like this: > > Found valid signature for > /gnu/store/cpw9yca1mcqhqfq450dr3rz2jzr95l69-glib-2.48.0 >>From

bug#26302: Deploying the i18n’d web site

Hi Florian, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > The attached patch for berlin serves more but not all URLs > properly when testing on a VM. > > I found one problem; the nginx locations for redirecting old URLs can > be given a higher priority via specifying = before the location path. One

bug#42294: gnujump stores store directory in cfg file

I opened ~/.gnujump/gnujump.cfg and I saw that there were two references to /gnu/store/...-gnujump.../. I noticed because the game wouldn't load since that directory had been GC'd. I changed it so that they referred to the directory in ~/.guix-profile, but that's suboptimal as a patch. --

bug#42289: recursive import does not dort alphabetically

Am 09.07.20 um 11:36 schrieb zimoun: > Do you mean the package definitions in gnu/packages/foo.scm? Yes. > Because they are generally not alphabetically sorted. Most file I've been working on ask for sorting alphabetically. (And IMHO this is a good recommendation to follow.) -- Regards

bug#42134: icecat: can't go back to duckduckgo search results

On 09.07.20 05:08, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hello! > > Jonathan Brielmaier writes: > >> When you search for something with DuckDuckGo, click on a result and >> then click on your browsers back button you end up at DDGs start page >> and not the results page. >> >> 1. Enter "guix" in your

bug#42289: recursive import does not dort alphabetically

Dear, On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 at 09:53, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > In most gnu/packages/*.scm files are (expected to be) sorted > alphabetically. Do you mean the package definitions in gnu/packages/foo.scm? Because they are generally not alphabetically sorted. Well, it really depends on which

bug#42291: data service: Show list of files and allow qeuerying

Dear, +Pierre because I am not sure he reads carefully debuugs. ;-) On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 at 10:13, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Serverity: wishlist > I often find myself checking the content of a package. For this I > would like to be able to inspect the list of files in a package, or > even query

bug#42292: committer.scm: Add support for new package definitions

Serverity: wishlistHi Ricardo, many thanks for the "committer script", which makes packager's live much easier. I'd like committer to be able to also detect and commit new package definitions. As of today, committer will take new packages as an update to the package in front. And if there are

bug#42291: data service: Show list of files and allow qeuerying

Serverity: wishlist I often find myself checking the content of a package. For this I would like to be able to inspect the list of files in a package, or even query for a specific file. This is much like Debian does in "list of files" for each package (e.g.

bug#42290: Support other VCS with "guix build --with-commit"

|Serverity: wishlist| guix build --with-commit only works with git repos. It would be nice if this would also work with mercurial, SVN, Monotone, CVS, etc. repos. Implementing this should not be too hard, as basically this is just setting a value in the source definition. (At least this is

bug#42289: recursive import does not dort alphabetically

In most gnu/packages/*.scm files are (expected to be) sorted alphabetically. Now when importing some packages recursivly, packages are output in order of the dependency graph, thus authors need to sort them manually. Example (requires the hex.pm importer from