Hi Stefan,
>I have however no clue, why the number of bytes is only 32 in case of aarch64.
>This value is taken from the struct ifconf read via ioctl(SIOCGIFCONF).
guix/build/syscalls.scm has:
>(define ifreq-struct-size
> ;; 'struct ifreq' begins with an array of IF_NAMESIZE bytes containing
Hi!
This change makes the reproducer working and prints some more values:
diff --git a/guix/build/syscalls.scm b/guix/build/syscalls.scm
index 85c1c45f81..250c577d33 100644
--- a/guix/build/syscalls.scm
+++ b/guix/build/syscalls.scm
@@ -1473,7 +1473,19 @@ most LEN bytes from BV."
(()
* gnu/services/virtualization.scm (qemu-binfmt-service-type)[guix-support?]:
Change the default from #f to #t.
* doc/guix.texi (Transparent Emulation with QEMU): Change the default of
‘guix-support?’ from #f to #t. Describe the implication of setting it to #f.
---
doc/guix.texi
zimoun writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 10:12, Imran Iqbal wrote:
>
>> ~ >>> guix test
>> Backtrace:
>
> [...]
>
>> ERROR: In procedure string-prefix?:
>> In procedure string-prefix?: Wrong type argument in position 2 (expecting
>> string): #f
>
> Thanks for the report. The commit
>
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
It comes from 'visit-snapshot-url' returning # instead of
#f. Then 'swh-url' fails because the 'path' argument is not a string.
Well, I do not how to fix it. I am confused by:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
;;
Hi!
When building for aarch64 on a x86…64 system, then the
‘network-interface-names’ function produces an error.
Because of this building guix for aarch64 fails during the test with this:
test-name: network-interface-names
location:
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 10:12, Imran Iqbal wrote:
> ~ >>> guix test
> Backtrace:
[...]
> ERROR: In procedure string-prefix?:
> In procedure string-prefix?: Wrong type argument in position 2 (expecting
> string): #f
Thanks for the report. The commit
Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2021, 09:35 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Leo Prikler skribis:
>
> > *gnu/system/shadow.scm (find-duplicates): New variable.
> > (assert-unique-account-names, assert-unique-group-names): New
> > variables.
> > (account-activation): Use them here.
>
> Final nitpicks!
*gnu/system/shadow.scm (find-duplicates): New variable.
(assert-unique-account-names, assert-unique-group-names): New variables.
(account-activation): Use them here.
---
gnu/system/shadow.scm | 44 +++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git
Howdy,
Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Leo Famulari skribis:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 03:36:07PM +0100, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas wrote:
There are several binary formats that allow compression of the
executable image, or some of its
See below
~ >>> guix --version
guix (GNU Guix) e57b978fc0a6b6298b96c68de4769655d793c7b9
Copyright (C) 2021 the Guix authors
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3
Leo Prikler skribis:
> *gnu/system/shadow.scm (find-duplicates): New variable.
> (assert-unique-account-names, assert-unique-group-names): New variables.
> (account-activation): Use them here.
Final nitpicks! :-)
> +(define (find-duplicates list)
Please add a docstring.
> + (let loop
Hi,
Leo Prikler skribis:
> Am Mittwoch, den 06.01.2021, 14:32 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Leo Prikler skribis:
>>
>> > > > +((first . rest)
>> > > > + (if (member first rest =) ; (srfi srfi-1) member
>> > > > + (cons first (find-duplicates rest =))
>> > > > +
Hi,
Stefan skribis:
> There were no ‘--chroot-directory’ flags in my case. So I wondered what is
> wrong and re-read the manual. I figured that I managed to copy-paste the
> ‘wrong’ example code from the “Transparent Emulation with QEMU” section into
> my operating-system definition, the
14 matches
Mail list logo
