Hi guix users,
It strikes me that a better course of action here would be, rather than
providing a warning that might not be noticed by the user, to remove the
default and force people to explicitly put `password-authentication? #t` or
`password-authentication? #f`.
That way if I have set up
"bdju" writes:
> Apparently there were issues back in August. Version number is still
> 1.0.0. Current build has been failing a couple weeks maybe.
> Build log here: http://ix.io/2OPc
> guix version: guix (GNU Guix) b421b2f66ec5b39bd1331e276bff5f9698cd65dc
> I am using Guix System.
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:04:48PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 02:47:30PM -0500, guix-comm...@gnu.org wrote:
> > commit 589b6be99634d0c42cf25e1599b2f62b0d8e89f7
> > Author: Efraim Flashner
> > AuthorDate: Sun Feb 7 21:47:01 2021 +0200
> >
> > gnu: xorriso: Update to
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 01:28:40PM +, soheil--- via Bug reports for GNU
Guix wrote:
> Users should be aware of anti-feature of packages.
> It is best to have anti-feature tag in anti-feature packages so that user
> know which program has anti-features; Like F-Droid. Also, user should be
>
Hi,
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 13:28 +, soheil--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
> Users should be aware of anti-feature of packages.
> It is best to have anti-feature tag in anti-feature packages so that user know
> which program has anti-features; Like F-Droid. Also, user should be aware
I have a USB-connected HP DeskJet Ink Advantage 1515 printer/scanner.
On my own system (this is a full Guix System, not Guix on a foreign distro) I
modified the configuration.scm:
```scheme
(use-package-modules #;... scanner)
(operating-system
#;...
(services
(append
#;...
Hey Ludo,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, it's always useful :).
> Seems to me that ‘BuildSteps’ is an orthogonal concern that has little
> to do with Cuirass’ job and with its data model. In Hydra I saw that as
> a (necessary) kludge.
I'm not sure to follow you here. Cuirass and Hydra
Hi,
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
>> here is an example: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/287478/details and
>> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/287476/details are being built at the
>> same time, and the logs currently show they are both running the test
>> phase of the php package.
>
> Thanks for the
Users should be aware of anti-feature of packages.
It is best to have anti-feature tag in anti-feature packages so that user know
which program has anti-features; Like F-Droid. Also, user should be aware of
anti-feature during installation. And wherever this awareness is needed...
An example is
Hi,
This is not due to NFS, but due to the fact that the NFS mount is
mounted nosuid (and nodev, probably). I can reproduce it on a local
filesystem mounted nosuid.
It seems that, when remounting a bind mount which is originally nosuid
inside a mount ns, you need to specify explicitely the
10 matches
Mail list logo
