bug#49511: [PATCH] gnu: add a2jmidid.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:38:53PM -0400, terramor...@cock.li wrote: > I can confirm it works. Thanks. Patch pushed! -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted sign

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:54:03PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > vde2: > Does not build with current OpenSSL. > Dependency changed to WolfSSL (unpackaged): > https://github.com/virtualsquare/vde-2/issues/2 > Depended on by QEMU but not qemu-minimal (optional): This is addressed by

bug#49510: [PATCH] gnu: Add PuTTY.

Sorry for wasting your time, there seems to be a problem with my client's attachments.

bug#49510: [PATCH] gnu: Add PuTTY.

Thank you for the quick response! I attached a patched created by `git format-patch`. Hopefully, this one will work.

bug#49553: ARM installation

Hi bug-guix, I tried running: guix system image --system=armhf-linux -e '((@ (gnu system install) os-with-u-boot) (@ (gnu system install) installation-os) "aoeuthant")' And got two unexpected behaviors. First of all, I get the error: |builder for `/gnu/store/05njkp7140yzkik9c3r3imfj0jdj68k1

bug#49550: Enable to boot from emmc on rockpro64

Hi guix! I'm afraid since commit 3a851d45576e046d696fcf35b34d57b2cd28ea49 [0] I've not been able to boot from eMMC on the rockpro64 board, it freezes before loading the kernel. Re-introducing the work-around fixed the issue for me (see patch attached). Did we mean to remove the work-around? I'm w

bug#49511: [PATCH] gnu: add a2jmidid.

I can confirm it works. Cheers.

bug#49510: [PATCH] gnu: Add PuTTY.

Hi, thank you for the review. I corrected the version of the package (putty doesn't use major.minor.patch, only major.minor), I fixed the lines that were over the 80 character limit, re added the check phase, corrected the formatting and put in the expat license. However, I do not know what you

bug#49173: ungoogled-chromium fails to build

Hi, qqq0ppp writes: > I tried to install it again and it worked. > Maybe the issue should be closed... I suspect a resources exhaustion issue. Building chromium is quite demanding in terms of both processing and memory. Closing. Thanks for the report! Maxim

bug#49510: [PATCH] gnu: Add PuTTY.

Am Dienstag, den 13.07.2021, 13:25 -0400 schrieb terramor...@cock.li: > Hi, thank you for the review. > > I corrected the version of the package (putty doesn't use > major.minor.patch, only major.minor), I fixed the lines that were > over the 80 character limit, re added the check phase, correcte

bug#48457: linkchecker 9.4.0 fails to build

Hi, Version 10.0.1 (the latest version) of linkchecker supports python 3, and I updated the package a month or so ago. Closing this bug report now. Cheers, Arun signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

Here are my notes on the users of the openssl-1.0 package: > File: networking.scm pidentd: Does not build with current OpenSSL, no newer releases or development No dependents vde2: Does not build with current OpenSSL. Dependency changed to WolfSSL (unpackaged): https://github.com/virtualsquare/v

bug#49307: clisp: build failure: failing tests

Hi, I'm not having trouble building clisp now from either my home nor my work computer. -Original Message- From: Christopher Howard To: zimoun Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant , 49...@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#49307: clisp: build failure: failing tests Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 06:13:41 -08

bug#49307: clisp: build failure: failing tests

Hello. The clisp build failure occured on my work computer, whereas the file corruption occurred on my home computer. Incidentally, I gave up home off solving the corruption issue and has to wipe and reinstall guix on that system. I will try to rebuild the clisp package now on both systems. --

bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors

On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:05:49 +0200 zimoun wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > > > >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. > > > > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) >

bug#49511: [PATCH] gnu: add a2jmidid

I made some changes to the package but I don't use jack so I can't test it out. Can you see if this works? -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted From cba2be5634a

bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors

Hi, On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. > > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > (These are warnings, not errors.) Because of that, I propose

bug#30290: guix-daemon slows to a crawl when a substitute server is offline

Hi, What is the status of this old bug#30290 [1]? 1: On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 at 23:34, zimoun wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 22:55, zimoun wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 at 22:07, Maxim Cournoyer >> wrote: >>> When a substitute server used by guix-daemon i

bug#49307: clisp: build failure: failing tests

Hi Christopher, On Sat, 03 Jul 2021 at 09:40, zimoun wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jul 2021 at 09:37, Christopher Howard > wrote: >> Hi, yes, I am able to reproduce the error, even when I switch to your >> guix commit (using time-machine). > > As Guillaume, CLISP builds successfully for me too. > > Could

bug#48213: offlineimap build fails

Hi, On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:55, zimoun wrote: > On Tue, 04 May 2021 at 16:39, Mark H Weaver wrote: > >>>From the command line, you can simply do this: >> >> guix build offlineimap --without-tests=python2-rfc6555 >> >> Within an OS configuration, or within a profile "manifest" file (if you >>

bug#25952: offloading empty machines file

Hi Tobias, On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 22:32, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > zimoun 写道： >> This bug [1] had not been commented since the last 3 years and it has >> been asked more info 3 weeks ago. > > The issue is that files such as /etc/guix/machines.scm (but this applies > equally to /etc/guix/acl