bug#50243: [core-updates-frozen] "multiple definition of..." build failures

2021-09-04 Thread Sarah Morgensen
Hi Ludo, >> lablgtk@2.18.10 >> libsrtp@2.3.0 >> ocaml4.07-lablgtk@1.18.10 I've sent patches [0] [1] to fix these by updating them. Together they have 79 dependents. [0] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50388 [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50389 -- Sarah

bug#44898: [wishlist] Make the GRUB installation procedure smarter

2021-09-04 Thread muradm
First I was using Guix on Lenovo Carbon X1 in parallel with Arch. Few times I experiences "NVRAM full" or similar problem, I don't recall now. Solution was to reset NVRAM by some procedure. Half a year now, I moved to System76 Lemur Pro, where I have only Guix alone. Here I have another

bug#50349: [PATCH] packages: Add 'define-package' syntax.

2021-09-04 Thread Sarah Morgensen
Hi all, Thanks for your comments. I'm replying specifically to this message but these thoughts apply to the issue as a whole. Maxime Devos writes: > Sarah Morgensen schreef op do 02-09-2021 om 21:06 [-0700]: >> Hello Guix, >> >> This patch adds a shorthand for "(define-public name (package

bug#50346: [PATCH core-updates-frozen] gnu: strace: Allow readlink, readlinkat tests to pass.

2021-09-04 Thread Simon South
Modify the invocation of strace's "readlink" and "readlinkat" tests to prevent them from failing due to an additional system call made by Guix's patched version of glibc. * gnu/packages/linux.scm (strace)[source]: Add patch. [arguments]<#:phases>: Do not disable the "readlink" test now that it

bug#50346: core-updates-frozen: strace 5.13 fails "make check" on AArch64

2021-09-04 Thread Simon South
Simon South writes: > But this additional call _is_ expected on Guix systems, so the test > cases ought to be modified to match. Perhaps, but having looked into this it's complicated because - The expected output from the tests is not contained in the source bundle in a separate,

bug#50349: [PATCH] packages: Add 'define-package' syntax.

2021-09-04 Thread Sarah Morgensen
Hi Taylan, Taylan Kammer writes: > On 04.09.2021 16:44, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> Taylan Kammer 写道: >>> To me the most obvious thing to do seems >>> >>>   (define-package foo ...)  ;no explicit name needed >>> >>> to bind the variable 'foo' and use symbol->string for the name of the >>>

bug#50349: [PATCH] packages: Add 'define-package' syntax.

2021-09-04 Thread Taylan Kammer
On 04.09.2021 16:44, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Taylan Kammer 写道: >> To me the most obvious thing to do seems >> >>   (define-package foo ...)  ;no explicit name needed >> >> to bind the variable 'foo' and use symbol->string for the name of the >> package, with the possibility to override the

bug#50264: ca-certificate-bundle fails to build

2021-09-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Lars-Dominik Braun skribis: > Hi, > > I’ve seen this multiple times now, most recently with commit > 8ef38cd1bf7ec17b8d1bc1c0bcb42ac30ac30406 on a foreign system: Some > operation, here a `guix pack` tries to build ca-certificate-bundle and > it fails the first time, but rerunning the same

bug#50349: [PATCH] packages: Add 'define-package' syntax.

2021-09-04 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Taylan Kammer 写道: To me the most obvious thing to do seems (define-package foo ...) ;no explicit name needed to bind the variable 'foo' and use symbol->string for the name of the package, with the possibility to override the name like (define-package foo (name "foobar") ...) which

bug#50243: [core-updates-frozen] "multiple definition of..." build failures

2021-09-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Sarah, Sarah Morgensen skribis: > Gentoo's tracker for this issue [2] also has some more info. I manually > searched Cuirass build logs and found 28 packages failing on x86_64 with > this error: > > arcan-sdl@0.5.5.2-1.b4dd1fb > aris@2.2 > blastem@0.6.2 > chocolate-doom@3.0.1 >

bug#50349: [PATCH] packages: Add 'define-package' syntax.

2021-09-04 Thread Taylan Kammer
On 04.09.2021 12:09, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > All, > > To keep a link with previous ‘define-package’ discussion, I've merged this > bug with #15284.  It was never resolved IMO and things have changed since > 2013 with the label-less input style. > > Maxime

bug#50371: guix system init fail with "In procedure map: Wrong type argument"

2021-09-04 Thread Sven Oliver Severini
root@gnu /mnt/rootfs/boot# guix system init /mnt/rootfs/etc/config.scm /mnt/rootfs/ Backtrace: In guix/ui.scm: 2185:7 19 (run-guix . _) 2148:10 18 (run-guix-command _ . _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 17 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In guix/status.scm: 820:3 16 (_)

bug#50349: [PATCH] packages: Add 'define-package' syntax.

2021-09-04 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
All, To keep a link with previous ‘define-package’ discussion, I've merged this bug with #15284. It was never resolved IMO and things have changed since 2013 with the label-less input style. Maxime Devos 写道: This could be even shorter in the special case that the variable name and package