Hello Guix,
Many Python packages rely on third party packages such as
python-setuptools-scm or python-versioneer to compute the version string
used as part of the packaging.
When these tools are missing, the version string ends up being '0.0.0'
in the resulting PKG-INFO package metadata file,
Attila Lendvai schreef op di 12-04-2022 om 19:47 [+]:
> and i can't get rid of this^ warning. i installed glibc-locales to
> root and my user, reconfigured, restarted the guix-daemon.
>
> which is probably the cause of the ultimate error:
>
> warning: failed to delete .git/refs/tags/v??.2.0:
i'm trying to build a golang package that i have just imported. its repo has a
tag with unicode in it, namely v½.2.0, as observable at
https://github.com/klauspost/pgzip/tags
(define-public the-pkg
(package
(name "go-github-com-klauspost-pgzip")
(version
Hi,
Andrew Tropin skribis:
> Prepared a patch series, which fixes the issues and sligthly adjusts the
> way home shepherd reload configuration logic works, now it happens only
> if configuration is changed and also it doesn't try to be smart and
> start a shepherd if it's not started yet.
>
>
Hi Ludo,
Oh, I had no idea that's how it worked... sorry about that. Indeed this
has fixed the issue. Thank you for your time!
Christoph
Hi Ricardo,
On lun., 11 avril 2022 at 18:15, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> zimoun writes:
>
>> $ guix import cran -a bioconductor CHETAH
>> guix import: warning: failed to retrieve package information from
>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/CHETAH/DESCRIPTION: 404 (Not Found)
>> guix import:
Hi,
Using 3670480, it is still the case, see below.
On mar., 22 déc. 2020 at 16:27, zimoun wrote:
> The package lilypond is still not reproducible with Guix af34f75.
>
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 at 05:24, Danny Milosavljevic
> wrote:
>> +++
>>
Hi,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:27:37PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello Efraim,
>>
>> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>>
>> > I'm testing %bootstrap-guile from bootstrap.scm and I'm getting a
>> > segfault when runing guile --version. I've attached an strace of the
I also wanted to report a [BUG]: the UI for Gnu Cuirass lists
specifications defined as targetting either `armhf-linux` and
`arm64-linux` as `armhf-linux` on the Web UI, which should be changed to
report the accurate build target (if both `armhf-linux` and
`arm64-linux` are indeed still valid
Hi,
This bug #34427 is marked as important 3 years, 5 weeks, 1 day ago. Is
it important? ;-)
http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34427
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 17:44, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:27:37PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Since I saw a build failure similar
Hi,
What is the status of this old patch #34453?
http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34453
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
>> When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
>> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't
On 2022-04-04 22:16, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Tropin skribis:
>
>> Activation script tries to load latest shepherd configuration with `herd
>> load root ./path/to/config.scm` and it starts a shepherd process. Login
>> shell starts the shepherd process as well. Probably we need
Hi,
Christoph Weiss skribis:
> Thanks for your reply. Just to double check, I ran another `sudo guix
> pull` and `sudo guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm`. I still
> cannot boot that installation.
>
> This is `guix system describe`'s output for my working revision:
>
> Generation 40
Hey Jesse!
Is this still reproduceable? It seems to work for me.
--
These download files are in Microsoft Word 6.0 format. After unzipping,
these files can be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
14 matches
Mail list logo
