bug#55011: let user drop into REPL from installer

2022-04-18 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Dienstag, dem 19.04.2022 um 01:23 +0200 schrieb raingloom: > I tried installing Guix with the installer, mostly to give LUKS a try > in a low effort way, but also to hopefully find some bugs. I > succeeded in the latter so far. :) > > I did a manual partitioning, with an encrypted BTRFS root

bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics^W nomodeset boot option

2022-04-18 Thread raingloom
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:50:02 +0200 "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 07:48:52PM +0200, raingloom wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:31:15 +0200 > > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 05:32:38PM +0200, raingloom wrote: > > > > On

bug#55013: Guix-emacs doesn't work

2022-04-18 Thread Ryan Prior via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi folks! I decided to check-in on the status of the guix-emacs​ package, since my understanding is it's had a change of maintainership a little over a year ago after its previous abandonware status. First I installed it into my normal Spacemacs setup, and that didn't work at all. Running

bug#55012: 32 bit shell based installer not showing up / no progress reports

2022-04-18 Thread raingloom
Not sure what's going on, it's possible my flash drive is corrupted, but Guix not giving any indications of progress is not very helpful. I managed to install it once from this flash drive and I haven't overwritten it since, so either I'm not hitting different code paths that are stored at

bug#55011: let user drop into REPL from installer

2022-04-18 Thread raingloom
I tried installing Guix with the installer, mostly to give LUKS a try in a low effort way, but also to hopefully find some bugs. I succeeded in the latter so far. :) I did a manual partitioning, with an encrypted BTRFS root and an ext4 /boot. The layout was left over from a previous failed

bug#54942: Can't run guix upgrade when a package is installed with the --with-git-url transformation

2022-04-18 Thread Maxime Devos
SeerLite via Bug reports for GNU Guix schreef op do 14-04-2022 om 12:45 [-0400]: > However, now I can't run `guix upgrade`. I get the following error: > > guix upgrade: error: the source of kakoune@2021.08.28 is not a Git > reference I guess the problem is that 'with-branch'/'with-commit'

bug#54942: Can't run guix upgrade when a package is installed with the --with-git-url transformation

2022-04-18 Thread Greg Hogan
Hi, The manual page Defining Package Variants [0] gives an example translating command-line options into a Guix manifest. The full list of options is found in the source [1] (including with-git-url). [0] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Defining-Package-Variants.html [1]

bug#55004: Cant build xonsh 0.12.1

2022-04-18 Thread arkhan--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
correct links: xonsh.scm (https://paste.debian.net/1238284) xonsh.log (https://paste.debian.net/1238282) 18 de abril de 2022 11:49, "arkhan--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix" escribió: > Hello, I'm trying to update xonsh to the latest version available which is > 0.12.1, but it fails in > the

bug#55004: Cant build xonsh 0.12.1

2022-04-18 Thread arkhan--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hello, I'm trying to update xonsh to the latest version available which is 0.12.1, but it fails in the installation step, I can't understand what the problem is, version 0.11.0 installs without any problem, I attach the log of the error and package definition: xonsh.scm

bug#54945: installer should have a no-graphics boot option

2022-04-18 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 07:48:52PM +0200, raingloom wrote: > On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:31:15 +0200 > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 05:32:38PM +0200, raingloom wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:44:58 +0200 > > > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > > > >[…]