Salut,
On Thursday, June 2nd, 2022 at 21:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> In the meantime, could you try the following config, which disables
> logging on tty12, to see if it boots quicker? The config changes is
> twofold; first, after the ‘use-modules’ form of your OS config, add:
>
> [...]
>
Hola,
Luis Felipe skribis:
>> Could it be https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55707? At boot time, if you
>> switch to tty12 (by pressing alt-f12) as soon as it’s available, do you
>> see messages that get printed pretty slowly, like 4–5 lines per second?
>
> Maybe? I recorded a video. Image is low
Howdy!
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> I tried capturing the issue in the commit message, but I'll provide
> another more hands-on view: the Jami service was broken due to changes
> in Shepherd 0.9.0 that caused the blocking sleeps + concurrent
> make+forkexec-constructor/container and
Hello again,
On Wednesday, June 1st, 2022 at 19:55, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> So it has to do with elogind taking too long to start. Same with
> polkit:
Timeouts are common here...
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>
> 854:May 31 12:24:10 localhost
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Before going further, I’d like to understand: this does more than just
>>> fix the Jami system tests, right?
>>>
>>> It would have been nice to have surgical changes to
Hello,
Arun Isaac skribis:
> That doesn't immediately ring a bell, but I could investigate. Do you
> have any way to reproduce this issue?
Of course not, it’d be too easy. :-)
> Also, which version of mumi and guile-xapian is this?
It’s this one:
--8<---cut
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 07:57:19 +0200
Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Le Fri, 20 May 2022 13:36:54 +0200,
> raingloom a écrit :
>
> > Sorry, can't debug this further right now.
> >
> > ```
> > $(guix build frama-c)/bin/frama-c
> > [kernel] User Error: [findlib] package 'ocamlgraph' not found
> >
Hi Ludo,
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> 2022-06-02 15:04:45 GET /issue/54065/raw/12
> 2022-06-02 15:04:45 GET /issue/43096/raw/2
> 2022-06-02 15:04:45 GET /issue/45676/raw/10
> 2022-06-02 15:09:09 GET In procedure delete-Database: Wrong type argument in
>
Hello!
Earlier today, I caught mumi in the middle of what I think we can call:
a bug. Specifically, a Xapian or SWIG bug.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
2022-06-02 15:04:45 GET /issue/54065/raw/12
2022-06-02 15:04:45 GET /issue/43096/raw/2
2022-06-02 15:04:45
Hello Josselin and Lars-Dominik
Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
[...]
>> Supposedly there are also patches for grub-mkimage, but maybe we can
>> include a workaround like the above by default until then or remove the
>> section about LUKS2 entirely?
>
> Thank you for
Hi,
Kyle Andrews skribis:
> For me it gave:
>
> 0
> /gnu/store/vncwfb53kbnyflyc1jyd2xv9sifpw202-gtk+-3.24.30/lib/libgdk-3.so.0
>
> Does this mean I have some store corruption as Maxime suggested?
Yes, that sounds likely.
Ludo’.
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Dehnel skribis:
> Just tested and Shepherd 0.9 does not fix this issue.
Could you be more specific? Specifically, could you share
/var/log/messages for the parts related to Wireguard?
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:48 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> One command sent to
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> Before going further, I’d like to understand: this does more than just
>> fix the Jami system tests, right?
>>
>> It would have been nice to have surgical changes to “just” fix the
>> tests, along the lines of
Hi again,
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, at 13:57, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> Indeed, that seems to work for those packages, but it still doesn't seem to
>> work for OneTuple, as mentioned here:
> I’m attaching a patch for that, please have a look. I’ll merge these
> into master, since they
Hey,
> Indeed, that seems to work for those packages, but it still doesn't seem to
> work for OneTuple, as mentioned here:
I’m attaching a patch for that, please have a look. I’ll merge these
into master, since they don’t change any builds.
> Aha! The upgrade to GHC 9.0.0 caused ghc-hashable to
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, at 11:59, Philip Munksgaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, at 11:53, Philip Munksgaard wrote:
>> Also, attoparsec still won't build with result of the import, but for
>> different reasons.
>
> Actually, that's weird. Didn't attoparsec used to build?
Aha! The upgrade to GHC
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, at 11:53, Philip Munksgaard wrote:
> Also, attoparsec still won't build with result of the import, but for
> different reasons.
Actually, that's weird. Didn't attoparsec used to build?
On Sun, 22 May 2022, at 11:55, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> thank you!
>
>> Unfortunately, building raaz still fails (first because of the description,
>> then because some internal libraries are added as external dependencies, and
>> then for... other reasons I haven't figured
Hi Lars,
On Sun, 22 May 2022, at 11:37, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote:
>> The attoparsec package on hackage defines multiple internal libraries inside
>> one package, named "attoparsec" and "attoparsec-internal", with the first
>> depending on the latter. Importing attoparsec using `guix import
Am Dienstag, dem 31.05.2022 um 10:37 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> (Is there a method to verify and repair a _single_ store item instead
> of the whole store?).
I think the syntax for that'd be ‘[sudo] guix build --repair
STORE_ITEM’.
Cheers
20 matches
Mail list logo
