bug#56308: Successful builds are stuck on ci.guix.gnu.org for 4.6 hours

Hi, Have a look at and take one of the crates there, e.g.: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1054529/details The current status is ‘started’, with duration 16844 seconds. However, looking at the log: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1054529/log/raw it took about

bug#55111: CONFIG_HSA_AMD unset in recent kernels

Addressed in #56200, pushed by Leo as 44f2c7c2ca5d0a275c61d5bfd9dde1205590504b

bug#56297: Guix style imperfections

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 12:18 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 12:15 [+0200]: > > Here, it depends.  I think I'd write this as > > > > (native-inputs  > >    (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs guile-3.0) > > (prepend

bug#56297: Guix style imperfections

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 12:19 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 12:15 [+0200]: > > > >     (delete-file > > > > "test- > > > > suite/tests/version.test") > > > > #t)) > > >

bug#56297: Guix style imperfections

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 12:15 [+0200]: > > >     (delete-file > > > "test- > > > suite/tests/version.test") > > > #t)) > > > > (Would be nice if "guix style" could be taught to remove those #t, > >

bug#56297: Guix style imperfections

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 12:15 [+0200]: > Here, it depends.  I think I'd write this as > > (native-inputs  >    (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs guile-3.0) > (prepend autoconf automake libtool >   flex gperf >  

bug#56297: Guix style imperfections

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 11:33 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > Hi, > > "guix style" occasionally makes some decision that seem a bit > questionable to me.  More concretely, copy the definition of guile- > next, put it in a .scm and rename it, and run > "guix style -L . guile-next-styleme".  I

bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 11:40 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 11:22 [+0200]: > > > And the exact same thing happens if a package is used instead of > > > a list of packages. > > One thing to check here is whether a cache might be interfering. 

bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 11:22 [+0200]: > > And the exact same thing happens if a package is used instead of a > > list of packages. > One thing to check here is whether a cache might be interfering.  I > think it is an already known bug, that the file itself is not key in

bug#56297: Guix style imperfections

Hi, "guix style" occasionally makes some decision that seem a bit questionable to me. More concretely, copy the definition of guile- next, put it in a .scm and rename it, and run "guix style -L . guile-next-styleme". I get: > (define-module (test)) > (use-modules (guix packages) (guix

bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always

Am Mittwoch, dem 29.06.2022 um 11:10 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 08:19 [+0200]: > > > Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely? > > Have you tried specifying a file that actually contains a package > > (not a manifest)? > > None of the examples

bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 08:19 [+0200]: > > Looks like "-f" is ignored entirely? > Have you tried specifying a file that actually contains a package > (not > a manifest)? None of the examples contain a manifest, oops-guix.scm actually contains a list of packages as

bug#56287: Downloading latest development snapshots not working

On 2022-06-28 19:29, Christian Miller via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: It currently is not possible to download latest development snapshots A work-around for now, in case you or others urgently need an ISO, is to download the latest successful 'build output' here:

bug#56289: "guix shell -f guix2.scm" fails always

Am Dienstag, dem 28.06.2022 um 22:47 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > Put the folllowing in "oops-guix.scm": > > (use-modules (gnu packages)) > (specifications->packages '("hello")) > > then do: "guix shell -f oops-guix.scm" to make an environment > with "hello".  I get: > > > guix shell: warning: