bug#56114: Guix does not have a documented general and practical procedure for lowering a single lowerable object to the /gnu/store/... string.

2022-07-04 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Mon, 04 Jul 2022 at 22:13, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I explicitly made “,build” hide that difference; I thought one would > just want “,build” to do the right thing and display the resulting store > item regardless of that kind of detail. > > Conversely, “,lower” is for die-hard hackers

bug#56297: Guix style imperfections

2022-07-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ludovic Courtès skribis: >>> (define-public guile-next >>> (let ((version "3.0.7") (revision "0") >>>(commit "d70c1dbebf9ac0fd45af4578c23983ec4a7da535")) >> >> Conventionally 'revision' is put on another line -- for these kind of let >> bindings, >> (maybe all?), I would recommend

bug#36924: GDM, GNOME Shell, etc. break when there are stale caches

2022-07-04 Thread reyman via web
Hi there After removing `gdm login` using a transformer and forget to modify/amend it into build-custom-services i break my system : (define-public %dm/system-services (append (build-custom-services identity) (modify-services %desktop-services (delete

bug#36924: GDM, GNOME Shell, etc. break when there are stale caches

2022-07-04 Thread Ludovic via web
Test (ignore).

bug#56114: Guix does not have a documented general and practical procedure for lowering a single lowerable object to the /gnu/store/... string.

2022-07-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! zimoun skribis: > However, note that, > > scheme@(guix-user)> ,build (plain-file "foo" "bar") > $1 = "/gnu/store/798sxvdgr0680czdggbls7rd3sfwk2yx-foo" > scheme@(guix-user)> ,lower (plain-file "foo" "bar") > $2 = "/gnu/store/798sxvdgr0680czdggbls7rd3sfwk2yx-foo" > > > which is confusing,

bug#56334: Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of compile-system?

2022-07-04 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Find the first draft attached. Do not merge, we need to figure out what to do with sbcl-stumpwm-kbd-layouts. signature.asc Description: PGP signature This fixes 2 flaws in the asdf-build-system: 1. Use asdf:load-system instead of asdf:compile-system. The latter is not recommended by the

bug#56383: Neither Gnome nor udisksctl can mount an nfs filesystem

2022-07-04 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Montag, dem 04.07.2022 um 16:03 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Hannud Abdo: > Ni! Connecting an external USB hard drive with an NTFS partition > fails to mount it on both Gnome (Nautilus) and manually through > udisksctl. Note that NTFS != NFS. But to solve your problem, simply add ntfs-3g to your

bug#56114: Guix does not have a documented general and practical procedure for lowering a single lowerable object to the /gnu/store/... string.

2022-07-04 Thread zimoun
Hi, If I read correctly, this snippet from the manual, >> scheme@(guile-user)> ,run-in-store (package->derivation hello) >> $1 = # ...> becomes scheme@(guile-user)> ,lower hello and this snippet, > scheme@(guix-user)> ,run-in-store (lower-object (plain-file "foo" "bar")) > $15

bug#56334: Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of compile-system?

2022-07-04 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
I found a blocker: Some StumpWM contribs like sbcl-stumpwm kbd-layout make calls at the top level which expect a running session of StumpWM, and thus asd:load-system will fail on them, while asdf:compile-system used to work. Suggestion: add an option to our build system to choose between

bug#56383: Neither Gnome nor udisksctl can mount an nfs filesystem

2022-07-04 Thread Alexandre Hannud Abdo
Ni! Connecting an external USB hard drive with an NTFS partition fails to mount it on both Gnome (Nautilus) and manually through udisksctl. On nautilus, it shows the partition but clicking on it pops a window: "wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb2, missing codepage or helper

bug#40641: Building from git breaks when /bin/sh isn't bash

2022-07-04 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > Thank you for getting back to the bug. I am in the same situation in > that I use Guix System now. :D > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:20:28AM +0900, elaexuo...@wilsonb.com wrote: > > so you could be able to sanity > > check with something like > > > > $

bug#53355: bug#51466: bug#53355: guix shell --check: confusing error message

2022-07-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, "(" skribis: > On Tue Jun 28, 2022 at 11:38 AM BST, Maxime Devos wrote: >> Then it could be fixed in that distro? And if the distro intentionally >> keeps it broken for years, then that seems more a problem in the distro >> than Guix to me. > > I believe Ludo' is referring to LTS distros

bug#56376: emacs-guix missing from package-activated-list

2022-07-04 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Sonntag, dem 03.07.2022 um 21:33 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath: > Hi, > > I've been looking into managing my Emacs packages with Guix. I found > that the `emacs-guix` package doesn't seem to show up in the > `package-activated-list`, even though its dependencies do, which > seems like a bug.