bug#57790: Strange behavior with emacs-build-system

2022-09-13 Thread Fredrik Salomonsson
Hi, I encountered a strange behavior when using a guix.scm file to build and run test in an emacs project. The project is called issue.el[0]. I have the following guix.scm: ---✀ (use-modules ((guix licenses) #:prefix

bug#57543: emacs-telega is broken

2022-09-13 Thread André A . Gomes
Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > Hi André > > I was able to swith back to a previous profile generation and use > emacs-telega again, see below Hi Giovanni! It's working for me too, following your steps! So, I believe we're agreeing that the commit we referred to should be reverted. Correct?

bug#57775: guix shell --root fails

2022-09-13 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
This fails on the first try: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix shell -D -f guix.scm --root=env-test Backtrace: 10 (primitive-load "/home/rekado/.config/guix/current/bin/guix") In guix/ui.scm: 2238:7 9 (run-guix . _) 2201:10 8

bug#57581: Failing to build the website

2022-09-13 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > zimoun writes: >> The culprit seems the package ’qtserialport’ in ’packages-builder’ from >> (apps packages builder). Maybe introduced by commit >> 1ef04fb2288dade3ad2883026ae286a68ef13a1e. > > This was a first failing commit for me too, but the

bug#50567: [core-updates-frozen] icedtea-6 fails to build.

2022-09-13 Thread Marius Bakke
Julien Lepiller skriver: > Again this is exactly where I was blocked. There is a checksum being > generated in classlist files from java code during the build. The classlist > file is exactly the same as the one in master, so it's correctly generated. > Fowever, at some point, the process

bug#57543: emacs-telega is broken

2022-09-13 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
Hi André I was able to swith back to a previous profile generation and use emacs-telega again, see below current emacs-telega is still broken, AFAIK André A. Gomes writes: > Giovanni Biscuolo writes: [...] >> André please could you try to switch back to a previous profile >> generation and

bug#57762: dragon-drop package's binary is missing

2022-09-13 Thread bdju
On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 10:32 PM CDT, bdju via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > After upgrades I no longer have the `dragon` command that is used by the > dragon-drop package, making the program unusable. The package is still > in my manifest file that I applied, still shows up in a search, and I