bug#62163: Suppress logging shepherd evaluation in mcron.log

2023-04-27 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hello, Bruno Victal writes: > Hi Ludo’, > > On 2023-04-27 14:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi Bruno, >> >> Ludovic Courtès skribis: >> >>> Bruno Victal skribis: >>> On 2023-03-30 11:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > You can send messages to the bitbucket with: > >

bug#63099: Dovecot FTBFS

2023-04-27 Thread 宋文武 via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Felix Lechner writes: > Hi, > > With a recent checkout of Guix, dovecot fails to build from source due > to failing tests. Looks like an assertion related to OpenSSL. A > partial log is below. Thanks! Fixed with a patch from:

bug#63118: Mumble failing to build

2023-04-27 Thread 宋文武 via Bug reports for GNU Guix
"J. Sims" writes: > Hello, > > As of at least bb385f247292d3162b27afa7ac48a1bf404c8e37, Mumble is > failing to build during compilation. Hello, fixed with use openssl-1.1. Thank you for the report!

bug#63133: python-ipy FTBFS

2023-04-27 Thread 宋文武 via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Felix Lechner writes: > Hi, > > With a recent checkout of Guix, python-ipy fails to build from source. Hello, update to 1.01 fix it, pushed, thank you for the report!

bug#63115: match-record cryptic error message on unbound record type

2023-04-27 Thread paren--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Maxim Cournoyer writes: > When a record type is not in scope, the error message produced by the > match-record macro from (guix records) reads something like: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > guix/records.scm:598:32: map-fields: bad use of syntactic keyword

bug#58485: [shepherd] Restarting guix-publish fails

2023-04-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Sorry for the late reply. I’m going through Shepherd bug reports and I remembered this discussion… Lars-Dominik Braun skribis: >> Can you confirm shepherd (PID 1) is 0.9.3? > it is: > > root 1 0.2 0.2 308148 76816 ?Sl Feb07 52:08 >

bug#63133: python-ipy FTBFS

2023-04-27 Thread Felix Lechner via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi, With a recent checkout of Guix, python-ipy fails to build from source. The log was more or less short enough to include below, and more than half seemed potentially related. Kind regards Felix * * * starting phase `set-SOURCE-DATE-EPOCH' phase `set-SOURCE-DATE-EPOCH' succeeded after 0.0

bug#63131: Dino explodes memory, CPU usage

2023-04-27 Thread J. Sims
Hey, --- Original Message --- On Thursday, April 27th, 2023 at 16:26, Josselin Poiret wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot reproduce on my end with a bare `guix shell dino -- dino`. > What windowing system are you using? Does dino have logs? Have you > tried launching it in a terminal to see if

bug#63131: Dino explodes memory, CPU usage

2023-04-27 Thread J. Sims
Problem resolved: apparently the issue was gst-plugins-bad in my system configuration causing problems (which I had hanging around from resolving a website-specific bug in GNOME Web... which I no longer daily-drive anyway). Thanks for sparking me to actually look into this. I don't know how to

bug#63131: Dino explodes memory, CPU usage

2023-04-27 Thread Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi, "J. Sims" via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > As of at least commit bb385f247292d3162b27afa7ac48a1bf404c8e37, when > attempting to launch Dino, it does not launch and instead consumes all system > memory and 100% of a CPU thread's execution time. I cannot reproduce on my end with a

bug#63122: guix refresh wrote the wrong version number

2023-04-27 Thread J. Sims
Just wanted to confirm I've seen exactly the same behavior on a personal project in my personal Guix channel - an extra ".1" was written at the end of a version number ending in ".1" while everything else worked fine.

bug#63131: Dino explodes memory, CPU usage

2023-04-27 Thread J. Sims
Hello, As of at least commit bb385f247292d3162b27afa7ac48a1bf404c8e37, when attempting to launch Dino, it does not launch and instead consumes all system memory and 100% of a CPU thread's execution time. Thanks, Juli

bug#62163: Suppress logging shepherd evaluation in mcron.log

2023-04-27 Thread Bruno Victal
Hi Ludo’, On 2023-04-27 14:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > Ludovic Courtès skribis: > >> Bruno Victal skribis: >> >>> On 2023-03-30 11:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote: You can send messages to the bitbucket with: (parameterize ((shepherd-message-port

bug#63122: guix refresh wrote the wrong version number

2023-04-27 Thread Jack Hill
Hi Guix, While working on the wlroots and sway update [0], I noticed the following odd behavior with `guix refresh`: The problem occurred when using `guix refresh` to update sway. A plain `guix refresh sway` reported correctly that sway could be updated to 1.8.1. However, when I ran `guix

bug#63118: Mumble failing to build

2023-04-27 Thread J. Sims
Hello, As of at least bb385f247292d3162b27afa7ac48a1bf404c8e37, Mumble is failing to build during compilation. Thanks, Juli

bug#63116: Geary packages are broken

2023-04-27 Thread J. Sims
It occurred to me it may be useful to note the commit where I noticed the build was broken. That is bb385f247292d3162b27afa7ac48a1bf404c8e37 The last commit where I knew Geary to be working (and where it no longer works for some reason) is 904b77e1814b611c256ecf161aa36f58d0882380 -Juli

bug#63116: Geary packages are broken

2023-04-27 Thread J. Sims
Hello, As the title suggets, builds of Geary packages are currently failing. The traceback reveals missing objects in the Vala source. Additionally, using the latest working commit I know of for Geary, the application is failing to launch with an error message reminiscent of that in 57920 from

bug#63115: match-record cryptic error message on unbound record type

2023-04-27 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, When a record type is not in scope, the error message produced by the match-record macro from (guix records) reads something like: --8<---cut here---start->8--- guix/records.scm:598:32: map-fields: bad use of syntactic keyword in subform map-fields of

bug#62334: Network is unreachable only for recursive pypi import

2023-04-27 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On mar., 25 avril 2023 at 14:23, Simon Tournier wrote: > Using the diff below, diff --git a/guix/build/download.scm b/guix/build/download.scm index db0a39084b..2eee984b31 100644 --- a/guix/build/download.scm +++ b/guix/build/download.scm @@ -409,18 +409,24 @@ (define addresses

bug#56866: [Shepherd] inetd connections not correctly counted?

2023-04-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ludovic Courtès skribis: > We recently experienced a bug on berlin.guix where we’d be locked out of > SSH access because shepherd (0.9.1) would say that the maximum > connection number on the sshd inetd service had been reached. This (1) the problem has not occurred again in the

bug#62163: Suppress logging shepherd evaluation in mcron.log

2023-04-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Bruno, Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Bruno Victal skribis: > >> On 2023-03-30 11:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> >>> You can send messages to the bitbucket with: >>> >>> (parameterize ((shepherd-message-port (%make-void-port "w0"))) >>> …) >> >> While it does work for expunging them

bug#62334: Network is unreachable only for recursive pypi import

2023-04-27 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 10:17, Greg Hogan wrote: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > $ guix describe > Generation 38 Mar 21 2023 13:38:52 (current) > guix 38b64d4 > repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git > branch: master >

bug#63036: -v or --verbose CLI argument input is undocumented in the CLI

2023-04-27 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 at 15:27, "jgart" via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Hmmm, what is the type and/or range of inputs that are valid for > LEVEL? What about this patch? diff --git a/guix/scripts/build.scm b/guix/scripts/build.scm index 72a24f91ac..35cb888c3b 100644 ---

bug#63020: guix import crate swhkd -r

2023-04-27 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On sam., 22 avril 2023 at 16:56, "jgart" via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > $ guix import crate swhkd -r > Backtrace: Fixed by #63053 [1]. 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/63053 Cheers, simon

bug#62619: Shepherd desertion upon service canonical name change?

2023-04-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Bruno, Bruno Victal skribis: > Upon a guix system reconfigure, if a running service has undergone a > canonical name change since the previous generation > then shutdown or reboot commands fail, with shepherd indicating itself (root > service) as stopped. Oh, fun. > mirai@guix-nuc ~$